Forums Latest Members
  1. jsflog Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    478
    Likes
    1,492
    Hi All,
    Wish you all an Excellent 2017.
    Can you please give me your opinion on this dial?
    Maybe some members will remember an old post about this same model, but with a differente dial.
    Thanks for any help,
    Cheers,
    JS 1.jpg 2.jpg
     
  2. rolokr Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    Looks like a redial, you should see groves in the registers, and dont think the overlapping is corect either.
     
    jsflog likes this.
  3. LaurentBxl Jan 2, 2017

    Posts
    158
    Likes
    187
    The overlapping seems wrong to me too,
     
  4. Diabolik Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,374
    Likes
    2,664
    I disagree with that. It looks correct to me apart from crown. I would have liked with mushroom pushers but that's me. Nice Pre 40s compax 30 in good condition. Difficult to find in such condition. would like to see case back and movement (should be a 386) . It should all be appropriately marked. On a black dial it would be a real collectors find!

    A little bit battered but here is another one ...

    upload_2017-1-4_9-37-42.png
     
    upload_2017-1-4_9-34-29.png
    Edited Jan 4, 2017
  5. rolokr Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    Redial or not ?
     
  6. rolokr Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    I dont see any grooves in the registers, and or swiss printed at the bottom ?
     
  7. Diabolik Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,374
    Likes
    2,664
    Nope ...! Not a redial.

    you wont see grooves on early UGs. Not the same compax 30 but no grooves ...

    upload_2017-1-4_13-42-15.png
     
    Timetosell likes this.
  8. rolokr Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    So your saying Uni-Compax don't have them either ? Does Uni-compax predate Compax 30 ?
     
  9. rolokr Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    Does Compax 30 predate Uni-compax ? I always thought I saw grooves on my Uni-compax? Maybe only Compax 30 dials had no grooves or swiss at the bottom ? Seems inconsistent ?
     
    20161211_192646.jpg
    Edited Jan 4, 2017
  10. Diabolik Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,374
    Likes
    2,664
    no, that is not what I am saying. I am saying that that particular Compax 30 does not have any. There are compurs that also do not have any but not all. There is no standard layout. There are differences.

    this may help ...

    upload_2017-1-4_14-0-39.png
     
  11. rolokr Jan 4, 2017

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    I guess part of my problem is I never seen a Compax 30 in person !
     
  12. jsflog Jan 5, 2017

    Posts
    478
    Likes
    1,492
    The first one is mine
    I believe it is a redial ad the space between A and L in UNIVERSAL seems to wide.
    Any comments much appreciated
     
  13. bubawatch Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    50
    Likes
    72
    ::facepalm1::

    Dino, the dial compax 30 is reprinted!!!
    Ciao
    A.
     
  14. jsflog Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    478
    Likes
    1,492
    Based on what you say it is reprinted?
    Thanks
     
  15. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    12,539
    Likes
    49,789
    Arghhhhhhh! Love these dial debates but not for faint of heart.
    ::popcorn::
     
  16. bubawatch Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    50
    Likes
    72
    Hello guys
    There is no universal dial with the numbers of hours chronograph rights.
    Are all radial.
    The second who posted Dino what is original.
    I'm sorry, good day.


    Sorry for the automatic translation
     
    Diabolik likes this.
  17. bubawatch Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    50
    Likes
    72
    Just back from holiday Dino, it 'to better explain
    He translates for me
    :whipped:
     
    Diabolik likes this.
  18. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    "There is no Universal dial with the numbers on the hours subdial upright. Only radial numbers are correct, as in the second dial posted by jsflog."

    Correct?
     
  19. jsflog Jan 7, 2017

    Posts
    478
    Likes
    1,492
    Finally got it!
    Thanks
     
  20. bubawatch Jan 8, 2017

    Posts
    50
    Likes
    72
    Yes correst.
    Thanks for the translation LouS
    Sorry for my bad English?
    I use google translator::facepalm1::
    Ciao
    A.