Universal Geneve Compax 30 Dial

Posts
481
Likes
1,505
Hi All,
Wish you all an Excellent 2017.
Can you please give me your opinion on this dial?
Maybe some members will remember an old post about this same model, but with a differente dial.
Thanks for any help,
Cheers,
JS
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,978
Hi All,
Wish you all an Excellent 2017.
Can you please give me your opinion on this dial?
Maybe some members will remember an old post about this same model, but with a differente dial.
Thanks for any help,
Cheers,
JS
Looks like a redial, you should see groves in the registers, and dont think the overlapping is corect either.
 
Posts
1,382
Likes
2,922
I disagree with that. It looks correct to me apart from crown. I would have liked with mushroom pushers but that's me. Nice Pre 40s compax 30 in good condition. Difficult to find in such condition. would like to see case back and movement (should be a 386) . It should all be appropriately marked. On a black dial it would be a real collectors find!

A little bit battered but here is another one ...

Edited:
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,978
I dont see any grooves in the registers, and or swiss printed at the bottom ?
 
Posts
1,382
Likes
2,922
Nope ...! Not a redial.

you wont see grooves on early UGs. Not the same compax 30 but no grooves ...

 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,978
Nope ...! Not a redial.

you wont see grooves on early UGs. Not the same compax 30 but no grooves ...

So your saying Uni-Compax don't have them either ? Does Uni-compax predate Compax 30 ?
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,978
Does Compax 30 predate Uni-compax ? I always thought I saw grooves on my Uni-compax? Maybe only Compax 30 dials had no grooves or swiss at the bottom ? Seems inconsistent ?
Edited:
 
Posts
1,382
Likes
2,922
So your saying Uni-Compax don't have them either ? Does Uni-compax predate Compax 30 ?

no, that is not what I am saying. I am saying that that particular Compax 30 does not have any. There are compurs that also do not have any but not all. There is no standard layout. There are differences.

this may help ...

 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,978
I guess part of my problem is I never seen a Compax 30 in person !
 
Posts
481
Likes
1,505
I disagree with that. It looks correct to me apart from crown. I would have liked with mushroom pushers but that's me. Nice Pre 40s compax 30 in good condition. Difficult to find in such condition. would like to see case back and movement (should be a 386) . It should all be appropriately marked. On a black dial it would be a real collectors find!

A little bit battered but here is another one ...


The first one is mine
I believe it is a redial ad the space between A and L in UNIVERSAL seems to wide.
Any comments much appreciated
 
Posts
50
Likes
74
The first one is mine
I believe it is a redial ad the space between A and L in UNIVERSAL seems to wide.
Any comments much appreciated

::facepalm1::

Dino, the dial compax 30 is reprinted!!!
Ciao
A.
 
Posts
481
Likes
1,505
::facepalm1::

Dino, the dial compax 30 is reprinted!!!
Ciao
A.
Based on what you say it is reprinted?
Thanks
 
Posts
13,010
Likes
51,919
Arghhhhhhh! Love these dial debates but not for faint of heart.
🍿
 
Posts
50
Likes
74
Based on what you say it is reprinted?
Thanks

Hello guys
There is no universal dial with the numbers of hours chronograph rights.
Are all radial.
The second who posted Dino what is original.
I'm sorry, good day.


Sorry for the automatic translation
 
Posts
50
Likes
74
Just back from holiday Dino, it 'to better explain
He translates for me
:whipped:
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,559
Hello guys
There is no universal dial with the numbers of hours chronograph rights.
Are all radial.
The second who posted Dino what is original.
I'm sorry, good day.


Sorry for the automatic translation

"There is no Universal dial with the numbers on the hours subdial upright. Only radial numbers are correct, as in the second dial posted by jsflog."

Correct?
 
Posts
481
Likes
1,505
"There is no Universal dial with the numbers on the hours subdial upright. Only radial numbers are correct, as in the second dial posted by jsflog."

Correct?
Finally got it!
Thanks
 
Posts
50
Likes
74
Finally got it!
Thanks
Yes correst.
Thanks for the translation LouS
Sorry for my bad English?
I use google translator::facepalm1::
Ciao
A.