Forums Latest Members

Universal Fuerza Aerea Argentina?

  1. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    990
    Likes
    3,835
    Darlinboy likes this.
  2. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    :eek:
    wow, a rare bird. I get your skepticism about the numerals and the Fuerza aerea symbol, but there's not enough empirical evidence to prove or disprove the dial's authenticity. I will say that the fonts used are identical to the ones used by UG and the symbol actually looks better than the examples found in Sala's book. If it is a redial, it's a pretty awesome one, but it looks like it has been re-lumed and the sweep second hand and pushers are incorrect replacements. Too bad, but perhaps for the right price, it could be a good project watch.
     
  3. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    Just to make it easier on everyone, here are the pictures from the listing

    $_57.JPG $_57 (1).JPG $_57 (2).JPG $_57 (3).JPG
     
    Shabbaz likes this.
  4. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    990
    Likes
    3,835
    Thanks for adding those, Jordan. I believe the hour hand is a bit too large as well. There are few examples to compare with, but the ones Ive seen have had snub nose 4 and hooked 7. I agree, its hard to believe it's a redial, but I remain a skeptic.
     
    Edited Aug 25, 2015
  5. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    990
    Likes
    3,835
    Here are a few examples:
    vF94YHC.jpg crjet.jpg crjet.jpg
     
  6. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    Rightfully so. One of the downsides of UG collecting is that, resulting from the fact that the manufacture did not care too much about uniformity, there are so many unknowns. Even with that hour hand, I think you are absolutely correct, but is it possible that it left the factory with that hand? Maybe? There are many supposedly correct examples of other UG chronographs that have this same hour to minute hand ratio problem.

    Here's a watch with the same dial as the one in the listing:

    689F8F74-BFD6-4A53-9D83-470FDBF6EF25_zps3xu7t84a.png
    10108-MLA20024668857_122013-O.jpg
    This fake case looked very familiar so after quick use of the search function, I found that this one was talked about almost exactly a year ago. @woodwkr2 Byron's thoughts on this piece here and here. If any of the Spanish speaking forum members could help us with this forum post that is mentioned, I would really appreciate it. After a closer look, these two dial types are more different from one another than I initially thought. All hour markers, not just the 4 and 7, are the thinner and taller in this dial and the font of the 'Universal Geneve' at 12 o'clock is thinner as well, but to be honest, I have no idea what to do with that information. Serially produced redial? That seems unlikely too.
     
    Darlinboy likes this.
  7. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    2,677
    Likes
    4,591
  8. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG Aug 25, 2015

    Posts
    990
    Likes
    3,835
    I saw a black dialed one 4 or 5 years ago when I was first starting out and wasnt convinced about dial authentiicty.
    At the time, 1k seemed like a ton of money for a watch I kinda thought was cool. Also thought a Bulova a-15 was intersting at $500. I would certainly like to own both those now....
     
    DirtyDozen12 likes this.
  9. woodwkr2 Aug 26, 2015

    Posts
    1,366
    Likes
    819
  10. woodwkr2 Aug 26, 2015

    Posts
    1,366
    Likes
    819
    Indeed. These are one off pieces. I've been to the flea market in BsAs where they surface. Many correct bits and pieces, regrettably from sellers who try to enhance the value by undertaking a "restoration" resulting in franken watch.

    Many of the documented watches (ie those that appear in print) have bits and bobs that are suspect too.

    Hay que tener cuidado.

    Also, beware the faked case number and reference. Circular graining anyone? Perhaps some diligent sleuth will find the thread where I explained this as regarded one of LouS's admitted frankens.
     
    Mark020 likes this.
  11. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer May 14, 2022

    Posts
    4,608
    Likes
    6,468
  12. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG May 14, 2022

    Posts
    990
    Likes
    3,835
    I remain a skeptic, some 7 years later....
     
  13. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer Feb 3, 2024

    Posts
    4,608
    Likes
    6,468
  14. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer Feb 14, 2024

    Posts
    4,608
    Likes
    6,468
  15. Ohmeguh Feb 14, 2024

    Posts
    369
    Likes
    1,585
    Some of these examples look identical. Do we have any updated opinions? It sort of looks like the previous examples were made by the same watchmaker and then there were redials of the original redials..
     
    watchyouwant and Mark020 like this.
  16. doctor steel Feb 26, 2024

    Posts
    207
    Likes
    649
    Hi, I just saw the thread ... this is mine.
    Reference 32415 ( chromed case )
    Case back serial number 1171xxx ( 1945 )
    Mov.: modified cal. 285

    It's exactly the watch published in Sala's book
     
    Screenshot_20240226_231028_Gallery.jpg Screenshot_20240226_231141_Gallery.jpg