Forums Latest Members

UG 881101/03 slate NO tri-compax??

  1. southtexas Jan 9, 2018

    Posts
    902
    Likes
    1,239
    Hello I’ve seen (online) various examples of this dial, some with white hands some with silver hands. I’ve also seen them for sale (here and elsewhere) where some have “tri-compax” over the lower subdial and some are blank (no tri-compax anywhere). Is this accepted? The dial is question is a bluish grey, with white hands and a red sweep hand.
    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Jan 9, 2018

    Posts
    12,537
    Likes
    49,785
    Pics?
     
  3. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Jan 9, 2018

    Posts
    12,537
    Likes
    49,785
    You ask a question and don’t provide an avenue to an easy answer.
     
    Florent likes this.
  4. southtexas Jan 9, 2018

    Posts
    902
    Likes
    1,239
    Sorry if I wasn't more clear. I actually found the answer to my question in a WTT ad posted here. It seems dials sans the "tri-compax" wording do exist.
     
  5. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Jan 9, 2018

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    They do. Explanation for the discrepancy not known.
     
    southtexas and aap like this.
  6. aap Jan 9, 2018

    Posts
    3,065
    Likes
    23,658
    Any guesses / hypotheses, @LouS ?
     
  7. southtexas Jan 10, 2018

    Posts
    902
    Likes
    1,239
    Thank you for your thoughts. Do you know of any UG literature, sales slicks, advertisements, catalogs, etc which show the “no tri-compax” variation in their marketing materials? Or otherwise, has the company publicly acknowledged their existence/authenticity?

    I assume the reasons why a batch of “no tri-compax” was produced are a complete mystery, and left only to speculation? Maybe the dial maker was hung over on this day (silly example, but used as illustration)?