Forums Latest Members
  1. jds1017 Feb 16, 2016

    Posts
    38
    Likes
    150
    After I posted this for all the members to help me out spot any red flags
    https://omegaforums.net/threads/question-on-this-tricompax.33826/

    another example found its way to me. This one was only 5 production pieces (based on the serial number) away from the first one! 2331223 vs. 2331228. I also noticed the beauty of the blued hands on this example. Now I've finally taken her home to join the UG stable.

    IMG_1047.JPG IMG_1048.jpg
     
    Delcampo, Georgieboy58, Garv and 13 others like this.
  2. x3no Feb 16, 2016

    Posts
    853
    Likes
    2,434
    Great pickup! :thumbsup:
     
    jds1017 likes this.
  3. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Feb 16, 2016

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,259
    you're gonna need a bigger watch box
    j2f76de2c016750cac8e00b6e775e2d4e.jpg
     
  4. jds1017 Feb 17, 2016

    Posts
    38
    Likes
    150
  5. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Feb 17, 2016

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    It's a trap! That one was Hodinkee'd, so you're looking at a huge increase in cost...
     
    wristpirate, jds1017 and LouS like this.
  6. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Feb 17, 2016

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,259
    Correct both with and without lume. The key is it should be consistent with the dial - lume on both or no lume on both.
     
  7. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Feb 18, 2016

    Posts
    7,384
    Likes
    20,738
    Ah.. Now that explains why it went straight from 4k to over 9k in a matter of 4 hours a few days ago...
     
    jds1017 likes this.