Forums Latest Members
  1. whippetman01 Mar 30, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    Castle4444 likes this.
  2. Faz Mar 30, 2018

    Posts
    3,542
    Likes
    21,555
    Very interesting as is but..a very complex and expensive project. Not for the faint of heart but it can certainly be extremely rewarding
     
    Matt87, Foo2rama and bloomy like this.
  3. Jdk93 Mar 30, 2018

    Posts
    11
    Likes
    1
    Damn, that's pretty beat. Is this supposed to be a restoration project?
     
  4. bloomy Mar 30, 2018

    Posts
    299
    Likes
    582
    Dial looks halfway decent...it depends on what type of thoughts you are looking for.
     
  5. DonovanMartin Mar 30, 2018

    Posts
    303
    Likes
    301
    Not really an investment but rather a project. Probably not a huge monetary payoff but could be rewarding to bring back from the abyss
     
  6. whippetman01 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    I was wondering about the combination of the dial,hands and bezel being correct?
    Ref 147.55 movement no 1937...........
     
  7. whippetman01 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    84C61F0A-29CE-41B4-BC7C-57560CEE7708.jpeg
    As you can see she has been to STS for service , Aldo for the bezel and the hands were relumed by James Heyman to match the (untouched) dial.
    Restoration and service cost less than £700
    I thought by showing it in its “original “ rough state it’s question of authenticity would be less cloudy.
    She came from an owner who claimed he bought it mid1960s from High Street jeweller and paid it off at £1 weekly.
    It als came wit a spare but near blank bezel.
     
    Edited Mar 31, 2018
  8. Dash1 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,825
    Likes
    3,502
    Unfortunately the dial and hands are wrong for a 14755. Bezel and bracelet probably original.
     
  9. whippetman01 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    Maybe jeweller took it in p/x in a damaged state and replaced parts in mid 1960s.
    Damage and wear are at least consistent throughout!
    Genuine old guy said he wore it everyday since he bought it.
     
  10. Rman Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    2,416
    Likes
    9,563
    A parts watch, where the parts of value aren’t in great nick. Hard to tell the condition of the dial.
    But heck the bracelets alone are going for big money these days.
     
  11. whippetman01 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
     
  12. whippetman01 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    Last Aldo restored Bezel sold for $1000+
    If you can find any bezel nude or otherwise please post a link.Rare a rocking horse shot
     
  13. Rman Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    2,416
    Likes
    9,563
    I guess I missed your post this morning.
    The bezels do come up for sale, occasionally on chronotrader.
    Your best bet would be to source some stick hands and have a watch that at least looks like a real reference, 165014
     
  14. whippetman01 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    Maybe with the early 1960s Omega we’re not quite so straightforward as we all think
    I refer to “Journey through Time”
    Photo 2721 CK147.55

    Quote " Diamond shaped or baton hands with Tritium inserts"

    From 1960.....???

    Photo 2721.....who really knows what went on?
     
  15. Rman Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    2,416
    Likes
    9,563
    Some claim that some of the last of the 165.014 came with sword hands. Not the 14755.
     
    gemini4 likes this.
  16. Dash1 Apr 1, 2018

    Posts
    1,825
    Likes
    3,502
    Yes this is correct. AJTT is not correct. But if it doesn’t bother you then don’t worry about it.
     
  17. whippetman01 Apr 1, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    5,514
    Really doesn’t bother me at all!
    Stuff happens to things over a 50 year period, think our bodies, cars, houses,women etc!
     
    sohail likes this.