Forums Latest Members
  1. Cooper 009 Aug 26, 2017

    Posts
    12
    Likes
    0
  2. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Aug 26, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    Expensive, IMHO.
     
  3. GordonL Aug 26, 2017

    Posts
    429
    Likes
    608
    Newbie_am_I but it looks expensive to me also.


     
  4. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 26, 2017

    Posts
    12,591
    Likes
    29,844
    Crazy expensive, especially considering the refinished dial.
     
    albertob and WhatYourWatchSay like this.
  5. albertob Aug 27, 2017

    Posts
    836
    Likes
    2,446
  6. Cooper 009 Aug 27, 2017

    Posts
    12
    Likes
    0
    Sorry for my naiveity, but what gives it away that it's been refinished?

    Chris.
     
  7. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Aug 27, 2017

    Posts
    12,591
    Likes
    29,844
    Placement of SWISS MADE (should be lower on the dial) also shouldn't have Ts since the dial has no luminous, imprecise printing of the minute track.

    I'm actually pretty sure this is a ref 166.0174 which is a Geneve not a Seamaster, so in addition to having a refinished dial I think the case back has been swapped.

    One other note is that 90-95% of blue and black dialed 50s, 60s and 70s Omegas offered for sale these days did not originally come in those colors.

    5860564b_xxl.jpg
     
    Edited Aug 27, 2017
  8. Cooper 009 Aug 27, 2017

    Posts
    12
    Likes
    0
    Wow, wish I had your eye abd knowledge
     
  9. albertob Aug 27, 2017

    Posts
    836
    Likes
    2,446
    Being in this forum will help you to gather a valuable knowledge! Welcome to OF and thanks to who commented this post :)
     
  10. blubarb Aug 27, 2017

    Posts
    3,592
    Likes
    8,091
    Too expensive and with an abundance of warning signs. Move on from this example,