Hello to all. The subdial hands are obviously off here, but I wonder about the dial. Older redial? there is some yellowing but I'm more curious about the logo print. The chrono hand being off that wee bit makes the symbol seem off... Legit?
Looks like the one from the Watches of Knightsbridge sale - Lot 298.. They reckon the dial is original and you have to bear in mind that an enamel dial is relatively easy to clean. As you say, the chrono second hand is half a second out which distorts the perspective. Judging by what 33.3s have been selling at recently, I'd be surprised if this doesn't make the better part of twice estimate.