Thoughts on the new Breitling 765 AVI reissue?

Posts

1,241

Likes

3,840

wristpirate

·Feb 18, 2020

Looks great, not bothered by fauxtina at all. Any idea whether it has the same dimensions as the original?

 

Posts

292

Likes

1,111

Lazy_Lightning

·Feb 18, 2020

The rose gold is attractive.

 

Posts

3,997

Likes

9,019

cvalue13

·Feb 18, 2020

I don’t know Breitling, but saw the below pictures watch (what I assume is a Breitling?) in a post by @Tri-national-man on a different thread. Seems similar to the new model being discussed here, but different from any pictures so far.

I googled a bit but it didn’t jump out at me. Any assist on the pictures mystery watch?

 

Posts

5,277

Likes

4,820

DLT222

·Feb 18, 2020·Double D @ ΩF

The rose gold... 🥰

 

Posts

2,039

Likes

7,171

MTROIS

·Feb 18, 2020

Another “reissue”??!? 🙄

 

Posts

419

Likes

1,169

Tri-national-man

·Feb 18, 2020

cvalue13

I don’t know Breitling, but saw the below pictures watch (what I assume is a Breitling?) in a post by @Tri-national-man on a different thread. Seems similar to the new model being discussed here, but different from any pictures so far.

I googled a bit but it didn’t jump out at me. Any assist on the pictures mystery watch?

Yes, this is my 765 AVI .. Its this one with the reverse panda dial that is also known as the “Raquel Welch”.. I’m thrilled by the look of the new re-issue and will be wanting to get that strap for mine..

 

Posts

3,997

Likes

9,019

cvalue13

·Feb 18, 2020

Shwing!

 

Posts

1,303

Likes

4,389

Speedmasterfan88

·Feb 18, 2020

I think it looks great! A reverse panda is lurking a long time on my WTB list but the prices are eyewatering. If they come up with a reverse panda version in the future it’s a definite buy for me (second hand that is).

Cheers,

Max

 

Posts

7,725

Likes

14,300

Evitzee

·Feb 18, 2020

Overall, this Re-edition is very well done, but I still think the Navitimer 1959 Re-edition from last year is a more compelling watch. But depends on what you like, same movement in both, and same price, too.

 

Posts

292

Likes

1,111

Lazy_Lightning

·Feb 18, 2020

Evitzee

Overall, this Re-edition is very well done, but I still think the Navitimer 1959 Re-edition from last year is a more compelling watch. But depends on what you like, same movement in both, and same price, too.

I don't think you can go wrong with either watch. Breitling did an excellent job with both and by today's standards, they're priced well.

 

Posts

663

Likes

4,779

yvrclimber

·Feb 18, 2020

I was impressed with the 1959 Navitimer Re-edition in the metal. I expect this 1953 Co-Pilot Re-edition will be as well done. Breitling was smart to recruit watchfred to help design them. IMHO these are the best watches Breitling had d'une for years. They are heading in the right direction.

 

Posts

827

Likes

8,285

Njnjcfp88

·Feb 18, 2020

Breitling is looking better and better again. I’ve always been a fan of their solid well built cases and bracelets.

 

Posts

2,039

Likes

7,171

MTROIS

·Feb 18, 2020

Njnjcfp88

Breitling is looking better and better again. I’ve always been a fan of their solid well built cases and bracelets.

I understand the appeal of the build quality... but why do we need a re-issue of an already issued watch from nearly 70 years ago?
Is this going to be a LE, or a regular production watch? If the former, then I get it, but otherwise... 😕

 

Posts

7,725

Likes

14,300

Evitzee

·Feb 18, 2020

MTROIS

I understand the appeal of the build quality... but why do we need a re-issue of an already issued watch from nearly 70 years ago?
Is this going to be a LE, or a regular production watch? If the former, then I get it, but otherwise... 😕

It's 1953 pcs in steel. An LE just like last year's Navitimer (1959 pcs).

Your question can directly be asked about the need for the Cal 321. Who needs a watch based on a 50+ year old movement?

It really comes down to marketing. Omega and Breitling make no money on vintage watches, so why shouldn't they get in on the act? Many people aren't directly aware of some of these old classic designs and aren't in any position, or mood, to try to source a real vintage model. So why not make an almost perfect re-edition with a modern, column wheel hand wound movement? I've always liked the old Navitimers but I wasn't interested in sourcing a good example which still gives me an old watch with all the issues they bring. Bought one of the 1959 re-editions last December, very happy with it. Looks right and carries a 5 year warranty, and after that can be easily serviced for many years.

 

Posts

230

Likes

600

dsacks30

·Feb 19, 2020

Beautiful piece! To me it is more compelling than the 806 reedition because for roughly the same price or just slightly more than the 806 reedition you could get a beautiful vintage Navitimer - so why not get the vintage one? Great looking 765s I’ve seen are around double the price of the reedition, so if you love the look but can’t afford a vintage 765 this is a great option.

 

Posts

1,042

Likes

1,340

arcadelt

·Feb 19, 2020

K killer67

Pretty true to the Raquel Welch. Hold the fauxtina please

Raquel Welch had a reverse-panda dial.

 

K

Posts

1,441

Likes

3,809

killer67

·Feb 19, 2020

You’re right - a panda would greatly appeal
to me

 

Posts

201

Likes

1,432

davten

·Feb 19, 2020

I love this and other reissues. I feel it’s part of a bigger picture. People’s taste in new watches will change as it always has.
Fauxtina is here to stay but that’s a small issue.
The main thing is a shift back to modest sizes and humble aesthetically pleasing designs that are not overblown and ostentatious looking IMO.
My Breitling 1966 806 Navitimer is my favourite watch. I’m into the idea of a re issue that I can wear without fear of knocking off a lot from the value as @kovpics previously said.