The right bezel makes all the difference...

Posts
1,691
Likes
7,347
I recently took in my second 105.012 CB that was in great shape...only thing missing was a DON bezel (it had been replaced at some point). And man, the right bezel makes allllll the difference. Hat tip to Bill Farrell for the DON.

Naked (I think this actually looks kinda cool):


With replacement bezel 馃ぎ (forgive the dog hair in the frame):


Ahhhhhh, all is right with the world again:
Edited:
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,962
With modern replacement bezel]
Just a nitpick, that's not a modern bezel. Though incorrect, it's only about 3 years later than the watch.
 
Posts
1,691
Likes
7,347
Just a nitpick, that's not a modern bezel. Though incorrect, it's only about 3 years later than the watch.
Corrected above. I thought the font size was more consistent with modern bezels. How can you tell that it's from the early 70's?
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,962
Corrected above. I thought the font size was more consistent with modern bezels. How can you tell that it's from the early 70's?
The dot next to 70 is the clue. First used on the -69 model in 1970.
 
Posts
3,801
Likes
22,736
I recently took in my second 105.012 CB that was in great shape...only thing missing was a DON bezel (it had been replaced at some point). And man, the right bezel makes allllll the difference. Hat tip to Bill Farrell for the DON.

Naked (I think this actually looks kinda cool):


I think your bezeless 105012 has a distant cousin!

 
Posts
576
Likes
858
The dot next to 70 is the clue. First used on the -69 model in 1970.
Thanks, learned something new, now I know that the one on my late -69 is correct (not that I ever had a doubt).
Edited: