Just goes to show you what magnificent technological achievement the Concorde was. Wonder if we'll ever get another chance to fly supersonic on an airliner again?
Reading a UK test pilots memoir (the late great Roland Beamont) he expressed frustration that the technology was not developed by the UK (imagine a more fuel-efficient Concorde etc) It was only supposed to be in service until 1999 I think (so it should have been replaced before the tragic accident that finished it off in 2000). People forget that New York banned it just long enough to ensure it would not be a commercial success, and then decided that it could land there after all. That delay killed the order book and any potential to develop it futher. One imagines the New American design will have a bit less of a political headwind, which won’t be just down to its superb aerodynamics :0)
CAS, IAS and TAS all look a bit complex to a non-pilot, without throwing in compressibility issues breaking the sound barrier etc. In terms performance It Looks like for Concorde the max cruising speed at 15,635 m (51,000 ft) M2.04 or 530 kt CAS, whichever is the lesser, equivalent to TAS of 1,176 kt (2,179 km/h; 1,345 mph).
It looks like a Tornado was TAS 1,300 kts @ Mach 2.20, 50,000+feet. A higher performance airframe as you would expect. But nowhere near the level endurance and comfort, not to mention the 128 passengers.
Considering Concorde was designed in the sixties, what an amazing plane, and so futuristic even today. All hand drawn back then and designed with slide rules......
The Tornado swing wing design came from Barnes Wallis as a slight aside. From wiki he also complained of the loss of aircraft design to the United States, and suggested that Britain could dominate air travel by developing a small supersonic airliner........
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98c9d/98c9dfb70542795dc2444801a967ecc105314b8f" alt="Stir The Pot ::stirthepot:: ::stirthepot::"