The Modest Moonwatch Alternative: Omega’s Speedmaster Reduced

Posts
1,578
Likes
5,736

Many of you will know that, from 1988 to 2010, Omega offered a smaller alternative to its Moonwatch known as the Speedmaster Reduced (reference 3510.50.00). There was also a series of smaller Speedmaster models that looked similar to the Reduced and offered a date or calendar, but only one used the original Moonwatch as a […]

Visit The Modest Moonwatch Alternative: Omega’s Speedmaster Reduced to read the full article.
 
Posts
2,436
Likes
2,587

Many of you will know that, from 1988 to 2010, Omega offered a smaller alternative to its Moonwatch known as the Speedmaster Reduced (reference 3510.50.00). There was also a series of smaller Speedmaster models that looked similar to the Reduced and offered a date or calendar, but only one used the original Moonwatch as a […]

Visit The Modest Moonwatch Alternative: Omega’s Speedmaster Reduced to read the full article.
When I first started Speedmaster shopping, I definitely considered that reduced. But what I couldn't get over is how the changed sub-dial spacing completely threw off the balance/appearance of the watch. I realize the spaced-out subdials is somewhat common in some movements (I've seen quite a few Venus movements that have this spacing too!), but if they were going to do a chronograph module, getting the subdial spacing 'correct' would have been pretty easy IMO (and I would have preferred the layout be correct too?).
 
Posts
99
Likes
334
Nice write up - thanks for sharing. I like the smaller case size, which would be pretty much mandatory for me, but actually prefer the manual wind and visuals a bit better on the Original. Great looking watches either way.