Submariner or Sea-Dweller? Pictures please!

Posts
1,567
Likes
859
[. ., post: 230588, member: 6538"]I've recently picked up my I have saved the sub or sea dweller is next for me.irst Sea-Dweller. I've had umpteen subs, ND, 16610 a few GMT masters, Explorers 2 and 2 and even a Yachtmaster at one time or another. (I have flipper-itis!!)

I'm really enjoying the Sea-Dweller though, this is a 1998 so still has tritium which I like. It's also been worm and polished a bit so I'm not worried to wear it or scratch it a bit.

I also love that there is no date bubble. I can't get on with a ND, as I use the date all the time but the bubble gets in my wick!

Happy for now! 7fc3175e0018d91d225abcfb36ca2a84.jpg [/QUOTE]
Love booth. Now I have my brand new 2015 speedy in time once i have saved for it a brand new submariner is next.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,983
Likes
7,089
Recently bought a 14060m 4 line ND Sub as a daily beater. Nice and light, low profile and I like the Tuna can clasp besides which it also has a rather interesting history.
 
Posts
305
Likes
2,187
I have both the sub and sd. To me honestly it's a preference. I prefer the seadweller to the submariner,it has a little more heft and a cleaner look with no cyclops.
 
Posts
640
Likes
194
You cannot go wrong with either Sub or SD, and if I had to be stranded on an Island with either, I'll take the SD. But I do believe I'm in the minority. J
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
Both are great. As a single watch for me the sub is more wearable