Forums Latest Members

Striking 1/10 vs Original 1969

  1. jsaen Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    2,334
    I have a modest vintage collection, and am also interested in more modern El Primeros. I think that some of you have both the Striking 1/10 and the Original 1969. What are your opinions of the two of them? And for those that have one or the other, why did you choose that?

    As far as I can tell, the Striking 1/10 has a really cool complication, but is larger. The Original 1969 looks pretty close to a modern A386. Of those differences I can't figure out which are important to me, so I'm hoping that hearing from others might help. :)
     
  2. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    8,736
    Likes
    69,169
    I've looked at both of these live and in hand. For me, the Original 1969 hews more closely to the spirit of the original, and the size is in a sweet spot, at least for me. The Strking 10th is, well, striking too, but does wear fairly large.

    Sadly, the star Zenith felt it necessary to stick on the end of the chrono hands annoys me, or I'd probably have bought one already. :cautious:
     
    Edited Oct 29, 2015
    jsaen likes this.
  3. NT931 Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    2,821
    Likes
    14,424
    The Original 1969 wears close to the A386, but the Striking 1/10th wears larger than it's 42mm would suggest. The original 1969 wears pretty well actually, but that red 'tinkerbell' hand is a bit of an eyesore, IMO.
     
    jsaen likes this.
  4. ELV web Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    24,651
    I really like the striking 10th, I passed it to my dad because it is the only watch that has enough water resistance in my possession. It is big though.
     
    jsaen likes this.
  5. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    Some images to help with the discussion - not an Original 1969 for comparison, but an original 1969, if you get my drift. diameter is more or less the same, but the modern Original is thicker.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    ELV web, Dogmann, Bienne2998 and 2 others like this.
  6. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    8,736
    Likes
    69,169
    @LouS - Thanks for that helpful on-the-wrist comparison. :thumbsup:

    Those both look great, but would look much better if.....


    they were mine. Just sayin'. :D
     
    jsaen likes this.
  7. Bienne2998 Oct 30, 2015

    Posts
    629
    Likes
    6,602
    I also like both. But for me the Striking 10 is a further development of the "normal" El Primeo A386 with a real cool complication. I would not go for a 69 remake if I can have the real deal.... or at least the Striking enhancement....
    Top AA.jpg Top 2.jpg
     
    jsaen and Dogmann like this.
  8. Bienne2998 Oct 30, 2015

    Posts
    629
    Likes
    6,602
    Lets see if it works. I tried to capture the cool complication on video. the first one is on normal speed ant the second one is a recording with the slomo video function of the iPhone


     
    stepe60 and jsaen like this.
  9. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Oct 30, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    that captures some of the stutter-steps inherent in the function rather well. When it first came out, there was huge denial about those.
     
  10. nicolas07 Oct 31, 2015

    Posts
    197
    Likes
    238
    Both are very nice for sure but I would definitively go for the Original 1969 as it is directly in line with the A386 and both might be a very interesting duo :)
     
  11. jsaen Nov 1, 2015

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    2,334
    thanks everybody, I really appreciate the opinions and information. The comparisons are great.

    In my best Scarlett O'Hara Voice: As God is my witness I will have an A386! So the real question is which one should go with it?
     
  12. ELV web Nov 2, 2015

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    24,651
    Quite obviously striking 10th then, why go for 1969 which is not going to be as good as the original and you do have the original.