Strange Rolex Submariner dial , 1972 ,

Posts
106
Likes
12
Case-No: 3189294. Reference-No: 1680. Movement-No.: D798157


I have bought today this Sub (1972) from a reputable Auction House . However, when I look at the photos of the dial, it seems very granular. The watch specialist at the auction house assured me that the dial was never repainted, but why is the black so odd ? Any ideas / siggestions , please ?

Thank you very much indeed !
Alexander (Paris )

 
Posts
74
Likes
808
Most likely the dial had contact with water / moisture at one point of history, which can end in that „grainy“ look on the dial.
Can you provide a closer picture of the dial?
 
Posts
5,445
Likes
8,512
It should be red anyway isn’t it? But indeed water damage
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
thanks very much . These are the best images i have . Obviously harder to see thruogh the glas . I am relieved , my nightmare would be if it had been repainted. It's a death sentence !
 
Posts
74
Likes
808
It should be red anyway isn’t it? But indeed water damage
You are right, the white Sub was introduced in 1975, before that it was the red sub.
So most likely the dial has been replaced.
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
are you sure about that ? I can not find any entry in the Rolex books to support this claim .
 
Posts
29,765
Likes
35,732
are you sure about that ? I can not find any entry in the Rolex books to support this claim .
The first white sub was the Mark VII dial and began around the 4M serial range, so 1975, it won’t be a ‘72 for sure
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
ok , so the consensus is that it is alater dial . What a shock. And the hands too ? because they they have the same patina. Any idea how old this dial could be ?
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
OK, thanks Littlemej ! So it is MK 3 dial , if my eyes are correct?
 
Posts
20,337
Likes
47,068
It is a later dial, added during a service most likely, with damage to the lacquer layer. At first glance, the bezel insert also looks substantially later, and probably a service insert.
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
Thanks, Dan. Were there service dials that were all white in 1972 or is it clearly the wrong dial ?
 
Posts
20,337
Likes
47,068
Thanks, Dan. Were there service dials that were all white in 1972 or is it clearly the wrong dial ?
No, it would be later. But a service dial would always be later anyway. Nobody has a service dial installed in the first few years they own the watch.
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
thank you very much indeed . I am horrified , will probably not be able to ever gid rid of this watch. What an idiot.
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
bracelet seems correct,. It is just to have paid for a 'collage' watch which is honestly shocking. Have only myself to blame !
 
Posts
106
Likes
12
i paid 9.150 Euros including commission . Can I ever sell it for 9 ? I mean, I have to get rid of it now.
 
Posts
20,337
Likes
47,068
It's common that watches in smaller auctions have some issues. This watch looks authentic to me, it just has some replacement parts. I don't know if you really have anything to complain about. It's not an example for a collector, but you probably knew that already from the condition of the dial. I do think that 9150 Euros is pretty expensive, but I guess it was an auction so other people were bidding. TBH, I'm often surprised how much people will pay for a Rolex with service parts, although they usually like them to look like new. Someone might want to send it to Rolex and have it upgraded with luminova hands/dial and new insert, and the case refinished.
Edited:
 
Posts
750
Likes
2,151
i paid 9.150 Euros including commission . Can I ever sell it for 9 ? I mean, I have to get rid of it now.
You need to go into the vintage sub market with a lot of knowledge: dial series, insert series, crystal, and then be able to judge the condition of the case, originality of the lume. And then also the bracelet and crown annd date disc are also to be considered. You may have spent a lot on that watch but a correct red sub is going to be a lot more expensive.