Forums Latest Members
  1. Speyside Ev3rclear's 8th fake account... or something Sep 1, 2015

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    8
    Hello,

    im new to this forum and seeking advice. For a couple of months now i am collectiong Omegas and already aquired 4.

    Just purchased this (5th) Omega out of an auction with genuine papers. Unfortunately the papers dont seem to match the watch. Also the serial number starting with "R" looks exchanged to me. Already contacted the seller. He is willing to reduce the price or to return it.

    Question: Was the watch stolen and the serial replaced? I may be totally wrong, to be honest i have no clue and i am also quite sure that the seller want aware of any issues.

    Thanks,
    Jonathan
     
    20150902_012345.jpg 20150902_012400.jpg 20150902_012417.jpg 20150902_012441.jpg 20150902_012455.jpg 20150902_012520.jpg 20150902_012536.jpg 20150902_012632.jpg
  2. CanberraOmega Rabbitohs and Whisky Supporter Sep 1, 2015

    Posts
    5,570
    Likes
    6,208
  3. Speyside Ev3rclear's 8th fake account... or something Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    8
    Thanks for the link.

    As i read through the posts its unclear if the conny has replacement parts or is a "prototype"?

    How come that the reference number on the papers does not match also?
     
  4. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    26,980
    Likes
    32,684
    It's not a prototype
     
  5. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    12,201
    Likes
    15,710
    Looks like the bridge was replaced. Not a big deal for me.

    I'd like to see a better picture of the dial. I would have some concern there.

    gatorcpa
     
  6. Speyside Ev3rclear's 8th fake account... or something Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    8
    whats the meaning of the CK 285 AP in the papers?
     
  7. JohnSteed Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    Possibly the caseback reference with last digit missing? So 2852
     
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    12,201
    Likes
    15,710
    JohnSteed likes this.
  9. ConElPueblo Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    You can click on the picture to load a bigger version of it - looks good to me.
     
  10. TNTwatch Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Yeah, I think it's good too, but did you notice the crossed T's with the applied OMEGA? That's not a normal dial variation.
     
  11. ConElPueblo Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    …I'll leave it to my betters to judge authenticity when it comes to details that minute :eek: - I simply haven't got the expertise! Just meant to say that the quality and patina of the dial had the right look :)
     
  12. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    12,201
    Likes
    15,710
    Not sure if that dial style is from a Ref. 2852. Looks more like a later model, but with printing of the earlier one. Could be a correct variation.

    I'm just not sure.
    gatorcpa
     
  13. Speyside Ev3rclear's 8th fake account... or something Sep 2, 2015

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    8
    i will return the watch as the papers dont match it or at least there is no proof that they do
     
    conny.jpg