Forums Latest Members
  1. wjr Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    I just picked this up. SS Tri-Compax. Any thoughts on this from experts?
    Appears to be unpolished and it's running well.
     
    20150402_141446-1.jpg
  2. wjr Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    Added photo of movement
     
    movement.jpg
    Nobel Prize, Dogmann and ELV web like this.
  3. M_franco Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    56
    Likes
    90
    Wow that's a beauty! Do you mind me asking where you got it?
     
  4. Zuke Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    968
    Likes
    1,720
    I don't know enough to comment on specifics - but that's a great looking watch. Congrats!
     
  5. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    what's the model and case number please? Should be on the back.
     
  6. wjr Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    back is blank. maybe inside case back?
     
    21324-6.jpg
  7. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    Yes, I think I see it in your pic above but I can't quite make it out.

    The issue is that this is a rather late model dial in a what looks like a rather early model case - sort of a stylistic mismatch. It's not beyond UG to make some odd combinations, but I'd be a lot happier if this had a relatively late case number.
     
  8. wjr Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    when I get a chance to take the back off I'll send you a picture. What range of case #s should there be?
    thanks for your input
     
  9. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    In my opinion (and I stress that, since there is no established evolution of UG dial style), 1.5 million or higher. I'd love to hear from the other obsessives regarding the dial.
     
  10. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Apr 2, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    Perhaps this is the elusive Transitional Tri-Compax? :p looks like a ref. 22279 case
     
  11. ELV web Apr 3, 2015

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    24,651
    Can actually make out the ref. to be 22279. Borrowing a zoom in from OP post. The serial number looks to start from 1 but followed by a 0, need to get a better picture to confirm perhaps. But if it is a 10 then that puts is Early half of 40s right? image.jpg
     
  12. wjr Apr 11, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    here are two new shots...1 of watch face and 1 of movement and inside watch back.
    reference # is 22279, case # is 1067248
    with a little searching, I've seen several examples of 22279s with this case and dial configuration. I've attached 1 similar here as well.
     
    20150411_125100.jpg 20150411_125706.jpg 7785A2010115-universal-tri-compax.jpg
    persco, Dogmann, lenny and 1 other person like this.
  13. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Apr 11, 2015

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    The second watch you posted is a different reference case and one which is thought to be younger than your case reference.
     
  14. wjr Apr 11, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    Yes, the watch I posted as an example is a reference 22279 from the 1950s according the Antiquorum.
    My watch with case # 1067248 is 1940s??
    As LouS says above, there is no established evolution of UG dial style, and it's not beyond UG to make different combinations.
    Here is another example I found. Sold at Sotheby's in 2013. Same case ref 22279 and case # 1155791 circa 1945.
    Very similar dial except with arabic numbers instead of straight indexes.
    Thanks everyone for your comments.
     
    10128s1010236-universal-tri-compax.jpg
    papaebetu likes this.
  15. wjr Apr 11, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    I answered one of my questions....1,000,000 case # dates the watch 1943-1945.
    So, I assume 1067248 makes this 1944.
     
  16. 10H10 Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    464
    Likes
    1,096
    Nice but it's a 1943 watch with a 60's dial (minute and secons counter fonts)...
     
    B.Frost likes this.
  17. Drawarms Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    ::popcorn::
     
  18. wjr Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    30
    Likes
    40
    10H10, I discredit such definitive statements in and area where there clearly is no definite.
     
    Drawarms likes this.
  19. 10H10 Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    464
    Likes
    1,096
    Sorry wjr, I didn't want to heart your feelings, you wrote "Any thoughts on this from experts?", I gave you mine and if you dig a bit in archives and such you will see that I am right. I can send you docs and photos that will prove it.
    Anyway, that can be easily fixed with a N.O.S. dial from the 40', I can get you one if you want.
     
    B.Frost likes this.
  20. Drawarms Apr 20, 2015

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    Wheres LouS!?