Forums Latest Members
  1. ewand Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    I saw this watch come up for auction and it looks a bit iffy to me - [​IMG]

    The hands are obviously new, but the dial looks suspect - it's supposed to be a 2998-61 but it has T SWISS Ts and the markers by the 12 o'clock make me think it's a dial from a 105. The strap looks like it's probably after market too. Are there any other gotchas?
     
  2. Barking mad Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    4,536
    Likes
    64,524
    Wrong dial, wrong hands and yes the bracelet is incorrect or at best has incorrect end links.
     
  3. ewand Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
  4. Barking mad Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    4,536
    Likes
    64,524
    If you get it for the estimate, absolutely.
     
  5. ewand Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    I seriously doubt it'll go for that ;-)
     
  6. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    A 2998-61 should have alpha hands, and that chrono second hand is wrong. Too short for one. The dial is wrong, shouldn't have T's.

    If you're looking for a keeper, this ain't it.
     
  7. E-diddy Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    572
    Likes
    418
    this thread supposed to be about a 2998? ;)
     
    Misterred likes this.
  8. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,015
    Probably an assembly
     
  9. davidswiss Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,078
    Likes
    1,808
    Movement number is 18946039 so looks correct, case and back may be ok so could be a decent parts buy if it's within the estimate.
    I can't help thinking, though, that an internet buyer will look at the picture of the case back, see 2998-61 and pay a lot of money.
     
  10. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,831
    It's a decent parts buy at 3-4x the estimate!
     
  11. ewand Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    I think the case back looks to have been engraved so that's probably a write-off. I for one, will not be buying but it will be interesting to see what it goes for :)
     
  12. davidswiss Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,078
    Likes
    1,808
    Really ?? I am surprised.
     
  13. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,831
    Movement alone is already worth at least the upper limit of the estimate.
     
  14. cf999 Jul 8, 2015

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    4
    Dial is marked T Swiss Made T.......
     
  15. ewand Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    It should be, though I'm not quite sure what the serial number reads. Now that it looks like an assembly job, that could be a 321 of any vintage...
     
  16. davidswiss Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    1,078
    Likes
    1,808
    No the number is 18946039 so makes it '61/'62 and looks correct.
     
  17. ewand Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    You've got better eyes than me then. To me, it could just as easily read 18742939, which would date the movement too early for a -61.
     
    serial.png
    cf999 likes this.
  18. Geordie Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    216
    Likes
    98
    Are the hands dodgy on this pre-moon 2998-61 Thanks. Sorry the pic isnt great. and I know the bracelet is none omega.
    original.jpg
     
  19. ewand Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    1,291
    Likes
    5,855
    Er, that's exactly the same watch as being discussed above :)
     
  20. Geordie Jul 9, 2015

    Posts
    216
    Likes
    98
    I know my post was redirected.