Speedy 145.022 case back help!

Posts
5
Likes
1
Hi!
I wonder if you guys could give me some advice/history of my new (old) Speedmaster?

it’s a 145.022 71ST. It’s dated from 1973 (my birth year)
There are a few things I wanted to ask and despite searching online I can’t find definitive answers.

1. Where should the serial number be? I need this for insurance purposes. I’ve looked in the caseback but can’t see anything other than the model number.
(Pic 1)
2. I can’t see any omega symbol on the Hexalite glass. Is this signalling an aftermarket replacement or is this something that some models had?
3. Inside the case back there is HF (merged together) engraved and then HF 7468 engraved. What does this signify?
4. Do the hands etc on the face look authentic for this vintage? I think the bezel is wrong but with my limited knowledge I think the hands and step dial are correct?

many thanks in advance for your sage advice!

Nick
 
Posts
1,818
Likes
9,071
Serial number is on the movement itself, not inside the caseback.

Hands and dial look appropriate.

Bezel: wrong but an earlier model, looks like a “Dot Over Ninety” (DON). Pictures are not good enough to say it is genuine but if so while not the right bezel it is a more desirable one. If real you can easily sell it for more than it will cost to replace with the proper period correct bezel.

Mark in the crystal can be very hard to see but if not there most likely a generic replacement.

Hope this helps.
 
Posts
491
Likes
951
There are two different watches pictured, one has a 321 case with shorter pusher profile, DON 90 bezel. The other one has a DN 90 with taller pushers correct for 71. Considering this discrepancy it will be really difficult to help you sort out your doubts.
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
There are two different watches pictured, one has a 321 case with shorter pusher profile, DON 90 bezel. The other one has a DN 90 with taller pushers correct for 71. Considering this discrepancy it will be really difficult to help you sort out your doubts.
Thanks so much for your reply. I had no idea the images differed. They were from the marketing on Chrono24.
Below is a pic I’ve just taken….
 
Posts
1,818
Likes
9,071
I can only really see the one in focus, the black background ones are too fuzzy on my phone, that’s what my comments are based on.

pmontoyap can see more than I can obviously 😉 and I am betting they are correct about multiple watches pictured.

edit: posted while you were posting the above. New pics are better and looks appropriate IMO.
 
Posts
20,592
Likes
47,414
WTF is going on with the photos? That last one has a bezel that I don't recognize at first glance.
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
WTF is going on with the photos? That last one has a bezel that I don't recognize at first glance.
Apologies Dan. I’m not sure why it’s duplicated the wrist shot if that’s what you mean?
 
Posts
20,592
Likes
47,414
I'm concerned about your bezel. It appears to have a dot next to 90 and also an accent over the E.
 
Posts
491
Likes
951
The serial number is on the movement. HF refers to the case manufacturer Huguenin Freres. The crystal without logo is a replacement. Hands and dial are correct but the hands have been touched up. Hope this helps
 
Posts
344
Likes
343
I'm concerned about your bezel. It appears to have a dot next to 90 and also an accent over the E.
i think the accent is a mark on the bezel.
If not, WTF is it?
 
Posts
5
Likes
1
I hope so.
Dan,
I think you are correct. My eyes aren’t what they used to be but the accent does in fact seem to be a very well positioned dink in the bezel….