Forums Latest Members
  1. gmmy775 Jun 14, 2022

    Posts
    342
    Likes
    326
    An enjoyable read. The point about finding this reference of Speedy which is all original is illuminating. Everything I have read is that this is almost impossible, so I have almost convinced myself that in the long run I would be more content to acquire the modern "321", and let it become vintage on my wrist. Ultimately though, if an certifiably unmolested '57 came along while I had the loose cash I would have to go that way. I appreciated the personal impressions of how it just feels right after wearing a few days.
     
  2. norb1967 Jun 29, 2022

    Posts
    498
    Likes
    407
    The speedmaster is a ‘better’ watch in my opinion; it offers more and I think Omegas are better watches, but that’s a personal thing. However no doubting how classic the Sub is
     
    Pun likes this.
  3. Slevin kelevra Jun 30, 2022

    Posts
    618
    Likes
    2,685
    I think both watches are very special and its not fair to compare them. Both deserve a place in any collection.

    I have a 14060 and a 145.022 69 and love them both equally.
     
    Duracuir1 and blufinz52 like this.
  4. Martin_J_N Jun 30, 2022

    Posts
    1,394
    Likes
    2,683
    Two Classic watches, the Submariner and the Speedmaster, two watches that are more than worthy of a place in any watch collection. I own both although neither are from the 'classic' era but mere modern replicas, a 2019 Speedy and a 2020 Submariner, both get a lot of time on my wrist.
     
    Pun likes this.
  5. norb1967 Jul 1, 2022

    Posts
    498
    Likes
    407
    Overall, this is 100% true.
     
  6. Bizcut1 Jul 2, 2022

    Posts
    224
    Likes
    267
    Great write up! Enjoy your watches!
     
  7. jb.44 Aug 8, 2022

    Posts
    80
    Likes
    109
    Really well said review