Forums Latest Members
  1. Magellan Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    10
    Likes
    2
    Hello,

    i got this speedmaster offered today. i think its pre-moon but i have no idea and i am afraid that it is franken. seller asked for 8k. shall i go for it? (sorry, only 1 picture taken with my phone - we didnt open it up yet)
     
    seamaster.jpg
    ReubenC likes this.
  2. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    add "2915?" to your subject line and you will get some more responses. i can't see that being legit at 8K... but maybe i'm wrong. having not seen many real 2915's, I'm going to wait for the experts. If it's real, you had better buy it right away!

    and i think we will need a few more pics, inside caseback, movement, etc.
     
    Giff2577 and JohnSteed like this.
  3. robocaspar Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    624
    Likes
    404
    That looks in amazing condition if it's an all original 2915. 8k would be highway robbery
     
  4. TNTwatch Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Wrong dial if bezel and hands are correct for the case reference (which is unknown at this point). Need a look at the movement and case back to make sure nothing else is wrong. But whatever it is, the bezel alone is worth more than the asking price, not counting the hands set.
     
    Giff2577 and oddboy like this.
  5. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Where's William when you need him?
     
  6. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    Watching the car crash in slow motion....
     
    SpikiSpikester likes this.
  7. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    Now i would prefer to comment after seeing the back, inside the back, and the movement number. But I am impatient

    Now the optimist in me sees a 2915 - even though we dont even have a backside picture.

    The bezel is interesting - possibly genuine but more likely a repro. (DO90 !)

    Hands could be old, but more likley newer, or even new (I am not good enough to tell), and relumed by the same person that relumed the dial.
    Subdial hands look too long, = new

    The pessimist in me sees it as very, very dodgy.
     
    JohnSteed likes this.
  8. JohnSteed Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    + 1. Need more pics

    ... and those hands cover O Sp ....
     
  9. ricardorio Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    629
    Likes
    4,537
    I think the dial is no correct for that model. ¿ It should be T swiss Made T ?
     
  10. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Whether the bezel is original or not, it's obviously been placed on the case slightly off centre.
     
  11. JohnSteed Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    If joking, then fine. Otherwise, no 'T'
     
  12. E-diddy Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    572
    Likes
    418
    add 2915 to the title and you'll bring down OF. looking forward to more pics.
     
  13. marturx Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,266
    Likes
    4,214
    If it`s to good to be true, it most likely isn´t....

    That said, still looking forward to see the photos of the back and inside
     
  14. BASE1000 Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    443
    Likes
    816
    ::facepalm1:: everything that can be seen in the pic is incorrect for a 2915:
    wrong hands
    (probably) wrong bezel (albeit not 100 % as nobody finally knows how many versions Omega issued then and how exactly they looked like)
    wrong dial
    wrong pushers.
    Maybe there is a correct caseback with "2915"? Recently a correct caseback alone was sold for 5k, so finally it might be the right price with all the other parts :D
     
  15. TNTwatch Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Assuming the hands have not been relumed, where do you suppose they could come from?

    About the bezel, how many versions that you're sure are original/genuine?
     
  16. TNTwatch Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    Was I too quick in regard to the dial, if the reference turns out to be 2915-2?
     
  17. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    @Magellan, the suspense is killing us here!
     
  18. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    If the truth be told, I think nobody here can say for sure whether it's real or not from just the one pic.
     
    Edited Jun 12, 2015
  19. gophishin Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    492
    Likes
    1,060
    one hell of an intro from @Magellan though... We need more!
     
  20. BASE1000 Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jun 12, 2015

    Posts
    443
    Likes
    816
    The dial is definitly not from a 2915, non of the three versions. It is a later 2998 dial.
    The hands are from the Broad Arrow Replica with vintage relume.
    This kind of bezel with flying away dots at the bottom (especially at 110, 120 and 130) I have seen maybe two times, one on a very expensive sold 2915 at Christies a couple of years ago. The buyer told me then, that the museum had bid with him to the end. I personally do not think that Omega produced such an irregular not symetric bezel (some dots are close to the inner ring and some are not) but who knows. everything is possible. You only need to look to different adverts from those times and you see how different the bezels were shown. I personally have two clear favourites from which I think that they are both the real thing. But they never show up in the market without the watch. At least, I never saw them in many years.
     
    STANDY and Giff2577 like this.