Forums Latest Members
  1. davy26 Limited comebackability is his main concern. Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    833
    Likes
    1,768
    Pleased to see this new model this morning. Looks very good to me and for a co-axial the price of £3,600 seems good.
    32430385003002.png
     
    Theognosis likes this.
  2. panaitchrono Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    264
    Likes
    142
    It's nice..I'll wait to buy it used, to a lower price.:)
     
  3. Alan_C Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    88
    Likes
    192
    That's actually quite nice. The oval dials really suit it.
     
  4. liebs520 Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    34
    Likes
    58
    Teddy bear counterweight on the seconds hand = deal breaker IMO.
     
  5. BostonCanuck Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    77
    That does kind of suck. Especially since this watch otherwise passes as a masculine version of a model that in its other colors and iterations seems to be oriented more towards women. Omega always seems to go one step too far in its special editions. :thumbsdown:
     
    Taddyangle likes this.
  6. davy26 Limited comebackability is his main concern. Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    833
    Likes
    1,768
    I'm not too keen either on the Ted, but it's surely no more inappropriate than that damn cartoon dog? (With all due respect to NASA and its adoption of Snoopy).
     
  7. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    17,103
    Likes
    25,348
    Even in the masculine colors the oval date window makes it feel super feminine to me.

    That being said I love this model for women, and think it looks great.
     
    Lode_Runner and BostonCanuck like this.
  8. abrod520 Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    11,261
    Likes
    35,476
    The weird oval motif on the subdials and date window on these new Reduced models is really giving me the heebie jeebies
     
    N1CK likes this.
  9. BostonCanuck Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    75
    Likes
    77
    I wonder how Omega will do with its new 38 mm Speedmaster in all of its colors and variations? I know that increasing their sales to women is a present point of focus for them. For me, the perfect size for a women's watch is now up at around 32-34 mm. Until now, I don't think Omega has ever tried to make a chronograph as small as that, or one at any size designed specifically with women in mind. And certainly 38 mm is not pushing it over the edge for a woman's size these days. So I guess I'm starting to see why this watch is such a big deal for Omega.
     
    Edited Oct 12, 2017
  10. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    17,103
    Likes
    25,348
    Speedy dates look great on women with small wrists at @40mm

    Heck this ones on a custom short strap for my GF on the shortest hole.

    IMG_4493.JPG
     
    Edited Oct 12, 2017
    BostonCanuck likes this.
  11. Rikeshchandra Guest Oct 12, 2017

  12. mr_yossarian Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    2,418
    Likes
    4,572
    Seriously..what is that for? Style at Omega has succumbed marketing idiots that formerly worked in the food industry?

    EDIT: a Teddy???
     
  13. Tiny Iota Could potentially be the Official OF Stalker ™ Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    1,069
    Likes
    3,099
  14. mr_yossarian Oct 12, 2017

    Posts
    2,418
    Likes
    4,572
  15. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Oct 13, 2017

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    tyrantlizardrex likes this.
  16. tyrantlizardrex Oct 13, 2017

    Posts
    8,881
    Likes
    27,410
    Again with the awful counterbalance widgit on the sweep seconds hand... be it 007 or a bear, it's ugly.
     
  17. TJH Oct 13, 2017

    Posts
    307
    Likes
    563
    How about a 'Time4APint' special edition with a dinosaur on the end of the second hand? :eek:
     
  18. tyrantlizardrex Oct 13, 2017

    Posts
    8,881
    Likes
    27,410
    ::facepalm1::
     
    TJH likes this.
  19. TJH Oct 13, 2017

    Posts
    307
    Likes
    563
    Indeed...I'm really not the creative type!
     
  20. craigbythesea Oct 14, 2017

    Posts
    129
    Likes
    160
    Some bits are nice but not so sure the date is the right place. Might make the hour chrono hard to read.