Forums Latest Members
  1. Schoffenhausen Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    Hi to all,

    I'm close to pull the trigger on this Mark II, but i would love to know what are the toughts of the experts about it. It has been serviced recently. Thanks in advance. [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]
     
  2. Bumper Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    623
    Likes
    1,142
    That's a 145.037, pity its been polished so much...
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  3. bnabod Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    372
    Likes
    1,987
    You can get that case redone properly . The dial looks nice but the hands look like they have been replaced
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  4. Schoffenhausen Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    How do you see it's a 145.037? By the hands?
     
  5. wsfarrell Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    2,441
    Likes
    4,133
    It's not a 145.037----caseback says 145.014. The 037 is very rare. Here's a (bad) picture from the web.
    images.jpg
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  6. Randy.Watson Jackson Heights own! Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    24
    Likes
    6
    Does anyone know the what the third line on the case back signifies and whether there is a 'correct' version of it?

    The third line on the case back above starts with "DD" but I've seen other versions incl. on fratello watches where the line says "brevet..."
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  7. Schoffenhausen Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    Hi Randy. I've notice that too, but untill now i didn't understand the difference between that and the one on Fratello.
     
  8. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    I may be completely wrong, but aren't those pusher tubes adapted for the remote pusher actuator extensions I saw photos of years ago?
     
  9. Schoffenhausen Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    Don't get me wrong, but can you translate (or maybe ilustrate)?
     
  10. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Spacefruit and Schoffenhausen like this.
  11. Schoffenhausen Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    Thanks a lot. I've googled ir and have found some info. Does this influence the value of the watch?
     
    Spacefruit likes this.
  12. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    Maybe if it had the correct case back.
     
    Spacefruit likes this.
  13. Schoffenhausen Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    There's no chance that this could be a .014 with the pushers prepared for the extensions? There isn't much information about this version of the Mk II
     
  14. dennisthemenace Hey, he asked for it! Aug 31, 2017

    Posts
    2,828
    Likes
    4,461
    It's not implausible that the pushers from the 037 would fit the 014 case. Finding them is another matter altogether.
    The only way to find out for sure would be an Extract if you buy it.
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  15. Randy.Watson Jackson Heights own! Sep 1, 2017

    Posts
    24
    Likes
    6
    Ah - so what is the difference?
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  16. Schoffenhausen Sep 1, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    I think it´s this ->

    "I don't know what the DDE stands for, but maybe it means that the patent was pending at that time.
    There is a patent which appears to fit.
    The 2750/67 seems to indicate the Swiss patent application numbet and the year during which it was applied for."

    Searching the web we a see a lot of case backs with the DDE.BR description instead the Brevet. I believe those (the DDE.BR) are older than the others.
     
    Randy.Watson likes this.
  17. Randy.Watson Jackson Heights own! Sep 1, 2017

    Posts
    24
    Likes
    6
    I you're right about the patents - that seems consistent with stuff I've read elsewhere.

    Any info on what years the DDE.BR case backs were roughly used?
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  18. Schoffenhausen Sep 1, 2017

    Posts
    102
    Likes
    340
    No. I don't have any idea
     
    Randy.Watson likes this.
  19. Dash1 Sep 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,825
    Likes
    3,502
    Actually the case is also different in that the 'holes' for the pushers are much larger than the standard mkII. So this is the very rare .037 version but sadly with the wrong back. I agree an extract would be worth it.
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.
  20. jimmyd13 Sep 1, 2017

    Posts
    3,156
    Likes
    7,166
    Uust to add to the wrong caseback theory: that's a delrin brake in there (unless the light is playing serious tricks) meaning the movement dates after 72. Working purely from memory, 32m serial number puts it there too.

    Case does look poorly refinished and hands don't appear to be the same age as the dial.

    Your money, your call.
     
    Schoffenhausen likes this.