Speedmaster DN90 v 220 bezel

Posts
147
Likes
28
Hi guys
I’ve asked this question previously.
Why is the 220 misprint bezel not valued higher than the DN90.
Regards
Con
 
Posts
5,861
Likes
16,797
Not sure of current values but the 220 is only correct for a limited range of 145.022-69. A short period of production I believe.
 
Posts
576
Likes
1,189
Perhaps because it effectively, only represents a time window of manufacture (no difference to a serial number) And if valued as part of the whole watch is easily diluted by condition/appearance of the watch as a whole. As Gemini4 says, it's not a lot of good if its not paired with a watch of the correct serial number.
 
Posts
13,260
Likes
23,037
Because Omega isn’t Rolex so minute errors or differences that have no overall impact on aesthetics or functionality don’t generally raise the value.
 
Posts
441
Likes
949
Mine says hello... what's a post without photos. 😀

I paid significantly more for the 220 error. It is subtle and unique. Came with green lume. But I think it is original lume. I love the combination and since no one can tell me definitely about the lume, i cannot be bothered about it. Enjoying this pc once in a while...

 
Posts
6
Likes
3
She’s a beauty. I’m super interested in these 220s as well, and mine shares a lot of similarities with yours. I’m also seeing green in the lume, and mine also has the same drop-end chronograph seconds hand, which I’ve come to learn is actually a older model chrono hand than the flat-end hand that typically came with the serial range of the 220 error bezels.

My serial number is: 30584XXX. I’d be curious to know if you knew your serial, or had come across any other info about the 220s in general.