Forums Latest Members
  1. masviken Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    22
    Likes
    9
    Hi guys,

    I have this dial that my wm says he can't fit to my 861 because it's a 321 dial, but now someone told me it's a 861 dial. Who is right?

    IMG_0131.JPG

    Edit: reference number
     
    Edited Aug 10, 2017
    fskywalker likes this.
  2. Slo084 Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    78
    Likes
    158
    looks like a late 80's dial for a cal 861
     
    Cuttysark likes this.
  3. Dash1 Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    1,824
    Likes
    3,501
    He probably means a 321 dial. It does look very much like an 80's 861 dial but maybe it's a late service dial for the 321. Might be able to tell from a rear shot.
     
  4. Maganator Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    1,170
    Likes
    1,728
    The feet on the back of the dial are longer on the 321 movement than they are on the 861 - as I understand it. That may give a better clue.

    Certainly looks like an 861 to me, but I am no expert
     
  5. cagkut Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    169
    321
     
  6. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    17,092
    Likes
    25,336
    Could be a 321 service dial.

    But looks like a 76-90 861 dial. Feet height is the only way to know.

    @cagkut why are you sure it's a 321?
     
  7. td69 Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    441
    Likes
    434
    +1 on looking at the rear of the dial.
     
  8. eugeneandresson 'I used a hammer, a chisel, and my fingers' Jul 13, 2017

    Posts
    5,001
    Likes
    14,594
    cagkut and JimJupiter like this.
  9. masviken Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    22
    Likes
    9
    Thank you all for the excellent replies, I'll snap a picture of the back when I get home!
     
  10. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    5,200
    Likes
    23,005
  11. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    I think cagkut was pointing out it's 321, not 312.
     
  12. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    26,442
    Likes
    65,491
    861 v 321...

    [​IMG]

    Cheers, Al
     
  13. M'Bob Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    6,396
    Likes
    18,165
    Can't help but noticing the base of the 861 looks a tad anemic, whereas the 321 appears quite robust. Was the 321 design over-kill...or the 861 a less than optimal re-design?
     
  14. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Jul 14, 2017

    Posts
    26,442
    Likes
    65,491
    The 861 design is pretty typical actually...
     
    M'Bob likes this.
  15. cagkut Jul 18, 2017

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    169
    I was sure that a watchmaker would be able to fit that dial if it was the correct one for the OP's 861 movement and if he couldn't, the only option is that the dial is for a 321 :)
     
  16. masviken Aug 23, 2017

    Posts
    22
    Likes
    9
    Ok guys, you where right. It's a 321 service dial. Any idea of what it's worth?
     
  17. FilippoB Aug 24, 2017

    Posts
    9
    Likes
    2
    I think probably for 861, the Omega logo isn't like that 321 dial.
     
  18. JimJupiter Aug 24, 2017

    Posts
    1,489
    Likes
    6,498
  19. rcs914 Aug 24, 2017

    Posts
    2,499
    Likes
    3,591
    Considering that there aren't many people whom would want that dial in a 321 watch, I'm guessing value is rather low. What about having them cut the legs and solder on 861 legs?
     
  20. masviken Aug 24, 2017

    Posts
    22
    Likes
    9
    The problem is that I can't find a watchmaker that is willing to do the soldering. This dial was sold to me by a forum member here who knew I was going to fit it to a 861, so that kinda sucks. I guess I should have done better research :(
     
    fskywalker likes this.