Speedmaster Dark Side of The Moon - Hands on, no chipping

Posts
25
Likes
39
Whats your experience with the scratch resistence of the ceramic folding clasp? Maybe some pics how it looks after intensive use?

I currently have the buckle and thinking of buying the folding clasp.
 
Posts
88
Likes
101
This is after 14 months. I don't baby my watch, the clasp and crown have rubbed and hit on everyday things... countertops, doors, railings, etc. Not a single scratch on the clasp.
 
Posts
252
Likes
230
Whats your experience with the scratch resistence of the ceramic folding clasp? Maybe some pics how it looks after intensive use?
I currently have the buckle and thinking of buying the folding clasp.

I was going to take a photo of mine but then realized it was pointless. The buckle looks exactly the way it does in the photos when I bought the watch (about a year and a half ago). Zero scratches on the titanium/paint or ceramic on the sides.

Now two aspects to consider in this comment:

1. I work at a desk/office most of the time and am usually very careful with watches. For example, I take it off if I'm changing a lightbulb in the car and think I might scrape it against something, etc. Not paranoid, but definitely the "careful" kind of user.
2. I have a stainless steel watch that is 2 years old and saw about the same use and that clasp is also in very good condition (point 1) but it has a few micro-scratches.

So the answer is "absolutely new" but it's a combination of the materials being good/hard and care.

The whole watch looks absolutely new in fact. ZrO2 is a really brilliant material. I thought about selling my DSOTM to finance another watch but ended up rejecting offers (which were 96% of what I paid) and decided to keep it.

Finally, I think the titanium/ceramic foldover (from .007 model) is totally worth it and I see no reason to buy the .003 instead unless the discount is huge. It looks better (IMHO), feels better and it also feels a lot safer when putting the watch on and taking it off. Even if your fingers slip or some clumsiness happens, it won't fall.
 
Posts
512
Likes
878
Have one for three years now which has been my go to watch for about a year and it looks pristine on both body and bracelet (yes, I bought the new style deployant bracelet once it became available). These XSotM ceramic bodies are really great, have three and none of them has given me any issue whatsoever so far.
 
Posts
252
Likes
230
Have one for three years now which has been my go to watch for about a year and it looks pristine on both body and bracelet (yes, I bought the new style deployant bracelet once it became available). These XSotM ceramic bodies are really great, have three and none of them has given me any issue whatsoever so far.

I'm expected that from this watch. Was totally speechless when I noticed the loose pushers on mine, but I'm almost 100% sure it came out of factory like that. In terms of body, ZrO2 seems like a brilliant material. Always looking shiny and new. Plus no fade on the dial or bezel.

People will keep talking about the risk of shattering since the material is hard but brittle, and that is something to consider for sure (a pusher alone costs over 300 EUR) but if you're wearing the watch carefully, you'll never crack anything. As with everything in life, some luck is also required of course, but it's a very interesting material IMHO and nicely implemented in a watch that has a nice movement and is very legible, retaining the Speedmaster look.

Too bad Omega diluted this model so much with all the funky variations in such a short little time. Very different from Rolex.
 
Posts
512
Likes
878
Agree on the variants, there are way too many. I do like the ones I have very much though :-P. Have banged mine around pretty hard, wore them fixing cars etc and as written above they are looking pristine. Hit one on a door frame hard enough to leave a dent once (on the frame! 😀), didn't faze it or the movement. I am sure you can break them but would think that you would ruin a stainless steel one with the force needed to do that as well (yes, SS would "only" have a massive dent and not shatter). My only complaint would be that the automatic is pretty noisy, I also had to get the reversing wheel changed on the DSotM.
 
Posts
25
Likes
39
Tnx for the replies.

I have my DSOTM (+/-) 2 years and the wristband needs to be replaced. Apparently wearing it at my deskjob has worn one of the keepers heavily.
 
Posts
667
Likes
1,215
The more I see these, the more I want one, practicality be damned.
 
Posts
88
Likes
101
Finally, I think the titanium/ceramic foldover (from .007 model) is totally worth it and I see no reason to buy the .003 instead unless the discount is huge. It looks better (IMHO), feels better and it also feels a lot safer when putting the watch on and taking it off. Even if your fingers slip or some clumsiness happens, it won't fall.

I think this point can't be stated enough.

The first 2 months of having this watch, I was still uber paranoid about making sure it won't fall. I always removed it over a soft landing zone, protected my left wrist more than the rest of my body, etc., but there was still one incident where I was probably trying to multitask and somehow let go of the watch.... only to have the foldover stay suspended over my fingers (this was over a tile bathroom floor 😲 ).

I also bought jewelry insurance for it that will cover the whole thing if anything were to happen. This is my only nice watch and I am proud to use it a daily wear, and the insurance is an easy reassurance. Just the other day when I was getting out of the car it rammed into the B pillar.... no harm done, but it's nice to know there's insurance...
 
Posts
88
Likes
101
The more I see these, the more I want one, practicality be damned.

Dooooooooo iiiiiiitttttttttt........
 
Posts
25
Likes
39
I have two omega's: a seamaster pro 300 and the DSOTM. Without a doubt the seamaster is the best value for money, by far. Its beautifull, unbreakable and can be worn 24hour a day.

However I also wair the DSOTM without any worries. I dont have insurance and even though i've the buckle strap, I never worry about dropping it. I feel confident it will survive. I even wair it sometimes (not very often) when I sleep or take a shower. The best thing of this watch is that it always looks like its brand new, not a single scratch, while my seamaster strap and clasp are full of scratches.
 
Posts
252
Likes
230
Yesterday...
Dust is the natural enemy of this fully black watch. Other than that, it remains looking brand new.

 
Posts
512
Likes
878
Said it before, they are hard to destroy - maybe not impossible but mine has survived a lot of impacts which would have damaged SS massively.
 
Posts
2,251
Likes
3,478
I scratched the AR coating the first week of owning one. And the leather strap looks like it went through hell. But the case is pretty much impervious to wear.
 
Posts
1,059
Likes
2,428
I scratched the AR coating the first week of owning one. And the leather strap looks like it went through hell. But the case is pretty much impervious to wear.

Well, quit chewing on it! Watches are meant to be worn...not eaten
 
Posts
252
Likes
230
The more I see these, the more I want one, practicality be damned.

Practicality is actually quite good unless you're super sporty and active. But a rugged diver will be better for that in any case.

Hit one on a door frame hard enough to leave a dent once (on the frame! 😀), didn't faze it or the movement. I am sure you can break them but would think that you would ruin a stainless steel one with the force needed to do that as well (yes, SS would "only" have a massive dent and not shatter). My only complaint would be that the automatic is pretty noisy, I also had to get the reversing wheel changed on the DSotM.

The rotor is quite noisy indeed on the 9300, like a bag of marbles. I'm not sure I'd call it a defect, it's more like a feature or trait. 😀
The movement itself also ticks loud, but I kinda like that.

ktc ktc
I think this point can't be stated enough.
The first 2 months of having this watch, I was still uber paranoid about making sure it won't fall. I always removed it over a soft landing zone, protected my left wrist more than the rest of my body, etc., but there was still one incident where I was probably trying to multitask and somehow let go of the watch.... only to have the foldover stay suspended over my fingers (this was over a tile bathroom floor 😲 ).
I also bought jewelry insurance for it that will cover the whole thing if anything were to happen. This is my only nice watch and I am proud to use it a daily wear, and the insurance is an easy reassurance. Just the other day when I was getting out of the car it rammed into the B pillar.... no harm done, but it's nice to know there's insurance...

I think the foldover Titanium/Ceramic clasp is fully worth it. It looks better, feels better and adds a bit of protection.

As for the watch itself, perhaps I'll show up expressing regret one day, but so far I think the worries about fragility are overblown. These things are not fragile at all and can take quite some beating. Most of it would leave marks in stainless steel but does nothing to the ZrO2. Dropping them to the floor might result in a bigger bill, but to be honest, if you're careless enough to let that happen, perhaps a simpler watch is better, as that isn't something you want to do even with normal stainless steel. There are other black alternatives for the more active/clumsy: 😁



I have my DSOTM (+/-) 2 years and the wristband needs to be replaced. Apparently wearing it at my deskjob has worn one of the keepers heavily.

Wow, I am very surprised by the damage to your strap. It's not exactly the same as the one in the .007 model, but I think the material might be pretty much identical. I've had mine for 1 year and 8 months and the strap looks almost new. I wear it at a desk job too. I'd say I wear it normally but remove the watch when I know there's changes for some damage to the strap (showering, playing with the cat - who seems to shred everything, getting my hands in the car engine to change a lightbulb, etc).
I'd say the watch and clasp look 10/10 new and the strap is 8.5/10 (you can see marks of wear on the leather on the inside, outside looks almost the same).



Oh, I've been timing it later and it seems to remain at +1.2s/day. That's accurate enough that I haven't even been adjusting it at the end of the month if it is necessary to change the date.
 
Posts
51
Likes
80
I scratched the AR coating the first week of owning one. And the leather strap looks like it went through hell. But the case is pretty much impervious to wear.

After almost 500+ days of writstime.... My DSOTM AR coating also scratch pretty bad.. then i use Cape Cod Polish to remove the AR coating.. till now the sapphire has no scratch anymore.

After removed the AR coating, i feel the watch is more shinny and I like it....
 
Posts
252
Likes
230
After almost 500+ days of writstime.... My DSOTM AR coating also scratch pretty bad.. then i use Cape Cod Polish to remove the AR coating.. till now the sapphire has no scratch anymore.
After removed the AR coating, i feel the watch is more shinny and I like it....

I remember when you bought yours. How come it scratched so easily? I think this might be the reason why Rolex only AR coats the inside of the crystals, so there's less chance of having the outside look "Scratched" even it's just the AR coating.

Just took this photo...