Forums Latest Members
  1. Kelz Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    38
    Likes
    3
    Hi all,

    I recently bought a Speedmaster and would like your opinions on it. If my homework is correct, it seems to be a 145.022 with a cal 861 movement. Circa 1985?

    I believe the cal 861 along with the case is original (Delryn brake + 17 jewel count?).
    However, it worries me that there is no S/N at the back of 7 o'clock lug. Also, the engraving on the inside of the case back cover also seems to look different from some of the other 145.022 case back inner engravings that I have seen on the internet.

    Unfortunately, I am almost certain that the dial/hands (non-Tritium, no "T Swiss Made T" subscript)
    and Tachymeter have all been replaced (dot not over 90?) (accent over e?).

    My conclusion: I suspect that I have a circa 1985 145.022 with an original cal 861/case/caseback but with replaced dial/hands/tachymeter.

    Can anyone confirm my suspicions and perhaps tell me what I have exactly?

    Thanks in advance.
     
    20140327_105314.jpg 20140327_105341.jpg 20140327_112940.jpg 20140327_112901.jpg 20140327_112736.jpg 20140327_113012.jpg 20140327_113535.jpg 20140323_145715.jpg
  2. JohnSteed Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    4,402
    Likes
    5,763
    1985 seems ok. Tables are an appriximation/guideline i use -

    http://www.chronomaddox.com/romans.html

    think yours looks very nice. And DON bezel are for earlier Speedies, I think. more comment should appear in short order. Just getting off a fast note (I'm in a meeting) LoL

    Enjoy!!
     
    Kelz likes this.
  3. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    Trituim was used up to 1990 or so, which means either the watch or dial are later than that.

    Don't worry about the s/n not being on the lug, that wasn't done until some time after this serial no.
     
    Kelz likes this.
  4. Joe K. Curious about this text thingy below his avatar Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    1,648
    Likes
    2,100
    A few quick comments:

    Serial number on lugs were introduced much later. So not a problem here.

    DON bezel were much earlier, so this would not be expected on your watch.

    Your dial is likely a service replacement and not the original.
     
    Kelz likes this.
  5. rolexfantastic Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    383
    Likes
    148
    Dial is 1995 or newer.
     
    Kelz likes this.
  6. Kringkily Omega Collector / Hunter Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    5,505
    Likes
    4,781
    The 1980's did not have the accent on the E so that is a replacement and so is the dial which was introduced around 97/98 transition to superluminova. The serializing came around 1991. Serial looks fine and the rest of the watch looks okay just probably been serviced and updated with newer parts.
     
  7. speedy4ever Moonwatch Only Author Mar 27, 2014

    Posts
    639
    Likes
    782
    Serial on lug appeared in 1990.
    tritium until 1996/7