Forums Latest Members
  1. Toishome Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    1,991
    Likes
    9,524
  2. Toishome Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    1,991
    Likes
    9,524
  3. rcs914 Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    2,496
    Likes
    3,588
    Foo2rama likes this.
  4. rcs914 Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    2,496
    Likes
    3,588
  5. Toishome Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    1,991
    Likes
    9,524
    The inscription on the case back looks like it was done by a drunken sailor............
    The writing on the dial doesn't look right either to me.
     
  6. abrod520 Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    11,218
    Likes
    35,254
    I think the BA 145.022 is a redial, the text is off. Also has the wrong chrono seconds hand I think. Agree the caseback is pretty messed up looking too...

    EDIT: Not a redial.
     
    Edited Aug 30, 2017
  7. bnabod Aug 29, 2017

    Posts
    372
    Likes
    1,987

    It is a sticker on the case back that is
     
  8. nixf6 Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    358
    Likes
    1,025
    This is a really good BA 145.022 thats going to go for real good coin.Nothing wrong with the dial or hands.The dial is an early version as reflected in it's serial number with the oval 'O' as stated in MWO .
     
    Foo2rama likes this.
  9. Tubber Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,920
    Likes
    6,886
    I wasn't too sure if it was just really low resolution photos?
     
  10. Tubber Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,920
    Likes
    6,886
    I find this remark offensive to drunken sailors!
     
    Timmert, stefman and CTS-V like this.
  11. Tubber Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,920
    Likes
    6,886
    It looks like they have added Hi-Resolution photos and it does look pretty mint.
     
    TLIGuy likes this.
  12. Tubber Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,920
    Likes
    6,886
    Plus the "rare as rocking horse sh!t", box.
    25397074b_org.jpg
     
    Foo2rama likes this.
  13. abrod520 Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    11,218
    Likes
    35,254
    Yeah, I was wrong about that one. Don't know as much about these without MWO handy as I thought.

    What about the caseback though, still looks slightly wonky even in the hi-res photos?
     
  14. SgWatchBaron Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    628
    Likes
    1,155
    perks713 likes this.
  15. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Perhaps poor camera quality used photographing the on auction watch

    The Auction watch. Poor photo.
    25397074i_org.jpg



    SgWatchBaron's watch. Detailed photo.
    434171-f944e14ff945a3237f1b352a45ed8448.jpg
     
    CTS-V and SgWatchBaron like this.
  16. abrod520 Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    11,218
    Likes
    35,254
  17. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Read the labels, two watches from different threads
     
  18. spiralkladd Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    61
    Likes
    13
    Well. The engrave is fishy or just a bad day in the life of Omega craftsman.
     
  19. Fatcat Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,386
    Likes
    1,811
    I need also that box :)))))))
     
  20. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 30, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Don't underestimate the ability of a crappy camera and lens to distort, especially a poor quality wide angle lens.
     
    Foo2rama and Spacefruit like this.