Forums Latest Members
  1. Tbone Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    182
    Likes
    536
    Hi Guys- I'm considering this watch for purchase but wanted to get some opinions first. The seller is asking 7k with box and papers. The case may be polished and the colors on the second counter looks a bit bright. The mvmt number is also out of sequence on Roman Hartmann's table but IS in sequence on Speedmaster 101. It's purported to be all original. L1011146.jpg L1011153.jpg L1011159.jpg L1011162.jpg L1011163.jpg L1011164.jpg L1011166.jpg L1011170.jpg L1011171.jpg L1011172.jpg L1011175.jpg L1011177.jpg Any opinions would be appreciated!
     
  2. watchlovr Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    7k what?
    Bananas?
     
  3. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    17,103
    Likes
    25,348
    Price is high that's over collector grade for this watch. 6k with all the goodies would still be on the high side. If it had the other bezel, then that's a slightly different story.
     
    SpeedTar likes this.
  4. SpeedTar Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    591
    Likes
    866
    My first thought too, may be a bit expensive
     
  5. ATWG Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    2,055
    Likes
    6,192
    Price seems a bit steep given that it does not have a DON or 1039 bracelet...I'd look else where for a better example and lower cost. There are plenty out there at the moment.
     
  6. Tbone Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    182
    Likes
    536
    Thanks, guys. Appreciate the input.
     
  7. rcs914 Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    2,502
    Likes
    3,593
    Those #47 endlinks look too small to me - like they were filed down, or originally came on another watch. Other pictures I could find of #47 endlinks on a speedmaster show them fitting the lugs correctly, so not sure what is going on.

    I think you will likely find that the consensus is $7K for this piece is overpriced by several thousand dollars.
     
    Spacefruit and Tbone like this.
  8. Tbone Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    182
    Likes
    536
    Ok, great to know.

    Is that mvmt number correct (per some tables) OR incorrect (per Romans table)??
     
  9. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    17,103
    Likes
    25,348
    I would trust the speedmaster101 tables.
     
    Spacefruit and rcs914 like this.
  10. watchlovr Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    All super advice unless the currency is Thai Bhatt, the OP has not stated any currency so you are all guessing.
     
    demollo and Davidt like this.
  11. watchlovr Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    The end pieces are 19mm, for a different watch.
     
  12. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    There is no seal and the inside ring of the seal slot looks to be kind of beat up. Is that seal residue on the movement retention ring. The movement has all the colors of the rainbow (parts swap?)
     
    Edited Nov 16, 2016
  13. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    GBP, USD, Euros, either way asking to much.
     
    Spacefruit likes this.
  14. Davidt Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    10,419
    Likes
    18,126
    That's not a 7k usd watch.

    Yet.
     
  15. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    17,103
    Likes
    25,348
    Non tropical, non transition, no DON. Basically a -72. Of all the 69 varieties this is low man on the pole.

    Also oddly the caseback is not shown... which if I remember correctly should be important to the value of this watch.
     
  16. uwsearch Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    1,055
    Likes
    1,596
    1. 47 end links are correct for this "not so original" 1175 bracelet (endlinks look filed)
    2. Why no picture of the outside of the caseback? should be a "straight writing" (with 32M serial)
    3. Got mine for 2.5k 2 years ago... market is getting crazy.
     
  17. bhove Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    54
    Likes
    68
    Its far too expensive, and probably a franken. Lugs are rounded it has definately been polished and too much IMO. The crown is a new, service replacement (not with the original 'skinny' logo), the bracelet is not original. Date/month stamp is missing. The serial number is out of range for a '69. It should be a 30 mio. number. The 32-number serial is probably from a 145022-71 Speedmaster. I'm unsure about the dial. I cannot from the picture see if its a stepped dial as it should be. This might be a service dial as well.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    Edited Nov 16, 2016
  18. abrod520 Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    11,261
    Likes
    35,476
    The 32m serial would be fine if this were a straight-writing caseback, but even pre-moon casebacks have been seen with 32m serials.
     
  19. bhove Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    54
    Likes
    68
    You might be right, and I might be wrong, but I have never seen an original '69 with a 32-serial number. I have a 69' with a 3058xxxx serial and a'71 with a 3223 xxxx serial. So I suspect a '71 caliber has been build into this watch.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  20. Davidt Nov 16, 2016

    Posts
    10,419
    Likes
    18,126
    Yes I agree. It's not a $7k watch at all.

    18 months ago, I didn't think an Ed White was a $15k+ watch either.

    I'd never buy a watch based on what the future value might be, but some sellers seem to be trying to sell them for it.
     
    Foo2rama likes this.