Speedmaster 105.003-65 minute hand length

Posts
219
Likes
177
I am returning a 1967 105.003-65 to correct. My watchmaker advises me that the tritium minute hand is 1mm longer than a normal 321 tritium minute hand. Is it true that the hands should just be touching the small minute divider marks?
 
Posts
30,886
Likes
36,329
You would really need to post photos for people to be able to tell rather than describing it ideally
 
Posts
6,796
Likes
21,982
No, I believe that would be short. Most from that era enter the track, but don’t go to the near or far edge. Photos would help though.

 
Posts
219
Likes
177
No, I believe that would be short. Most from that era enter the track, but don’t go to the near or far edge. Photos would help though.

I am returning a 1967 105.003-65 to correct. My watchmaker advises me that the tritium minute hand is 1mm longer than a normal 321 tritium minute hand. Is it true that the hands should just be touching the small minute divider marks?
The inside of the small minute divider marks

 
Posts
219
Likes
177
No, I believe that would be short. Most from that era enter the track, but don’t go to the near or far edge. Photos would help though.

M'Bob,
Thanks for getting back. Same as yours. Just touching the inner minute divider
 
Posts
219
Likes
177
You would really need to post photos for people to be able to tell rather than describing it ideally
Thank you. I've posted a photo.