Speedmaster 105.003-64 with 2998-2 movement; what to do?

Posts
1,128
Likes
5,185
Hi all,

Earlier this weekend, I got to look at a fairly nice 105.003-64. It has quite a few service parts (bezel, hands, crown) but otherwise looked good, with a fairly good dial featuring a decent base colour and all printing intact. The tritium lume is a bit tired, but not fiddled with. The dial matches the reference in the caseback; 105.003-64. So far, so good, ish.

Now the challenge; upon removing the dust cover, the movement bearing a symmetrical clutch bridge and a way too early serial was revealed. Serial 173025XX. Looking at MWO, it would fit exactly in the start of the 2998-2 range.

Question to us here is what to do with a watch like this; would it make sense to get the movement extracted and would the value of a confirmed 2998-2 justify parting out an otherwise reasonably okay, but far from original Speedmaster?



Curious about your views!
 
Posts
9,504
Likes
14,986
There is no guarantee it’s from a Speedmaster. It might be, it might not.
 
Posts
1,128
Likes
5,185
There is no guarantee it’s from a Speedmaster. It might be, it might not.

Agree fully, so it is hypothetical. Question here is what if it gets confirmed to be a CK 2998 movement?
 
Posts
20,067
Likes
46,702
Agree fully, so it is hypothetical. Question here is what if it gets confirmed to be a CK 2998 movement?

What if Omega doesn't provide an extract, which is quite likely. To be conservative, that should be your assumption going into this.
 
Posts
316
Likes
276
My understanding is if you know it is out of range you are most likely going to loose that money asking for an extract, right? Franken like in this case.