- Posts
- 3,307
- Likes
- 12,915
MtV
·Hey folks,
I was offered this watch, and while I won’t take it, it still made me curious about its authenticity. Hope you don’t mind being consulted out of curiosity alone. 😀 Some pictures:
It’s a 136.011, according to the case back. Looking up the ref, it seems to exist either as a SM600 or a Genève. Omega Archive lists it as the former, cal. 611/613, which also matches this example, movement serial points to 1964, which also makes sense as the model was introduced in ‘62.
And yet I can’t find another one that only says Seamaster on the dial, and 1964 is a little late for a Coathanger S, I thought. Nevertheless, the font looks correct to me, even though it’s on a sunburst dial.
Does anybody know if this ref also exists as a Seamaster without “600”, or might this be a replacement dial in an otherwise correct watch?
Thanks in advance! 😀
I was offered this watch, and while I won’t take it, it still made me curious about its authenticity. Hope you don’t mind being consulted out of curiosity alone. 😀 Some pictures:
It’s a 136.011, according to the case back. Looking up the ref, it seems to exist either as a SM600 or a Genève. Omega Archive lists it as the former, cal. 611/613, which also matches this example, movement serial points to 1964, which also makes sense as the model was introduced in ‘62.
And yet I can’t find another one that only says Seamaster on the dial, and 1964 is a little late for a Coathanger S, I thought. Nevertheless, the font looks correct to me, even though it’s on a sunburst dial.
Does anybody know if this ref also exists as a Seamaster without “600”, or might this be a replacement dial in an otherwise correct watch?
Thanks in advance! 😀
