SM 300 Sweep Second Hand?

Posts
12
Likes
3
Question

Are the SM300 sweep second hand supposed to be painted white or polished? Or both?
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,957
You’re going to need to be more specific about which SM300
 
Posts
759
Likes
804
Well, that is a fake SM300, so the second hand is a relatively minor issue.

Usually the unpainted second hand is an indicator that the watch may not be genuine. The unpainted hands are common with the fakes
 
Posts
12
Likes
3
Here is caseback.

I'll need to know some more about why it's fake so I can return.

 
Posts
2,842
Likes
4,537
Sadly these fakes are common. There was a thread about them just last week. One can purchase 'kits' which have aftermarket counterfeit cases and dials. The movements are usually pulls from plated cased watches, so the movements can be real, but this is basically a pig in lipstick.

The aged color of the lume on this is also a giveaway. The coloring is too even and a bit dark. It takes looking at 100s of examples to see what is wrong. Many here have done just that.
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,957
It’s a genuine vintage omega movement, with a fake dial, fake case, fake bezel, fake everything except the movement
 
Posts
288
Likes
209
This kind of aged fake watches can be seen more and more often... i have reported one on Chrono24 cca a week ago.. the add was banned, but a day afte it was adverised again by the same seller... it is a neverending fight...
 
Posts
10,440
Likes
16,324
And again! I told you, it should be a sticky!!

 
Posts
12
Likes
3
Yep. I thought I did enough research. Assumed the steel sweeping second hand was a service hand or variation, which turned out to NOT be enough research. These really are a minefield...
 
Posts
24,252
Likes
54,000
The easiest way to tell its fake is to google the fake kits and compare.
 
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,957
You need to look at a lot of genuine examples and familiarise yourself with the nuances of the case, its contours, the bezel and its edges, the caseback engraving, the dial font. The fakes look ridiculously obvious when you know what you’re looking at.
 
Posts
131
Likes
466
You need to look at a lot of genuine examples and familiarise yourself with the nuances of the case, its contours, the bezel and its edges, the caseback engraving, the dial font. The fakes look ridiculously obvious when you know what you’re looking at.
For a beginner, finding a lot of genuine examples is not so easy. I have used the search function on the private sellers forum on here on OF and have looked at the SM 300s there. However I need more genuine articles to look at. If I search on ebay or Chrono24 I have no idea if it's real or not. The best advice is @padders 'Just don't'. But they are so beautiful, and they tempt me!
 
Posts
12
Likes
3
Yep. I thought I did enough research. Assumed the steel sweeping second hand was a service hand or variation. These really are a minefield.
Yep. I'll get made whole on this no problem, but no way I'm touching one of these again. Not worth the hassle.
 
Posts
24,252
Likes
54,000
I do think that these references and Tudor subs are the two worst things to buy currently.
 
Posts
131
Likes
466
I do think that these references and Tudor subs are the two worst things to buy currently.
I took your advice from the post a few replies above and googled 'fake seamaster 300 kits', feeling dishonest to even search for this. The companies that produce these fakes have the cheek to market them as 'watch kits'. To quote one such kit:
STUNNING VINTAGE OMEGA SEAMASTER 300 SPORTS GENTS COMPLETE WATCH KIT.
ref..166.024.DATE
PROFESSIONALLY RECENTLY REMADE AFTERMARKET CASE +ROTATING BEZEL,


CRYSTAL.CROWN,DIAL AND HANDS ARE GENUINE REFURBISHED
Don't you just love 'GENUINE REFURBISHED'!!!!