Forums Latest Members

Size check- 8500 PO 45.5 vs explorer II

  1. jcmartinez98 Dec 17, 2019

    Posts
    711
    Likes
    944
    4287DBA6-1E62-4D50-903F-21C0ED425007.jpeg A9F0E7F7-49AA-45C7-AF6B-39133BC23ABF.png I am considering buying a new Rolex explorer II and have read online about its heft. Case width is 42 mm but I have read that it “wears bigger than that“ and it has been compared in size to a SeaDweller, which I have tried out and felt was too large.

    I do have 45.5 TiPO 8500, which I love

    Since the explorer II does not exist in the wild anywhere near where I live, I am looking to see if anyone can post side-by-side photos or if they can describe the similarity or difference between how these watches feel on the wrist. Thanks so much.
     
    orlis likes this.
  2. Linzer Dec 17, 2019

    Posts
    370
    Likes
    811
    Not a 8500 but the same 45.5mm size. I hope it helps. In the pictures the PO looks a lot bigger but in real life the difference isn't that big.
    DSC00942.JPG DSC00943.JPG DSC00944.JPG DSC00945.JPG
     
    scapa and sdre like this.
  3. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Dec 17, 2019

    Posts
    17,106
    Likes
    25,350
  4. Mathlar Dec 17, 2019

    Posts
    537
    Likes
    798
    The Explorer II is only 12.5mm thick.... and certainly wears smaller to me because of this than a Sea Dweller, PO or even a 42mm Speedy. A lot depends on your wrist shape... I'd certainly recommend trying it on.
     
    jcmartinez98 likes this.
  5. jcmartinez98 Dec 18, 2019

    Posts
    711
    Likes
    944
    Linzer likes this.