I'll start by saying I am a fan of the brand, and have owned a 356 Flieger II in the past - now owned by another OF member...
The other watch in that photo is my wife's 456 with blue MOP dial - she loves that watch and still has it. I didn't sell my 356 because of any problems with it, but simply because I have a Speedmaster and so I was not really wearing the Sinn much anymore. I do miss it sometimes though...
So having said all that, and having serviced a number of Sinn watches, and a number of watches with Sellita movements, I'll give you my thoughts:
1 - I've not worked on an SW500 just yet, but have worked on other Sellita movements in the past. I can only use those as a comparison, and in my experience the Sellita movements have not been as accurate and reliable as the ETA counterparts. More on this in a minute, but I often cite the 7750 as the most accurate movements I work on - they generally take very little effort to get running VERY well, so they set a very high bar to begin with.
2 - Yes there have been in the past. Again I can't speak to the SW500 specifically, but having seen a bunch of damaged SW200's and the "fixed" SW200-1's, they have had reliability issues as a brand.
3 - Seems like you are asking the same questions in different ways...so again I'll just say that the 7750 typically sets the bar very high.
4 - This is subjective so I can't really answer that...
It is often stated on watch forums that these Sellita movements are "identical" to their ETA counterparts. From a collector point of view that may be right to a degree, but from a watchmaker's point of view it certainly is not. Most people refer to the envelope dimensions and functionality, rather than specific details. Let's look at some comparison shots to see what differences there are between these movements.
Here are two barrel bridges - calibers they are from are noted on the photo:
You can see at the red arrows that one has pins on the underside of the bridge, and the other has holes. These are to locate the bridge on the main plate of the movement. Not saying one is better than the other, but this means that all bridges and main plates can't be swapped between the ETA and Sellita movements. This may seem minor, but the result is that you need specific parts for the Sellita - ETA parts often simply can't be used, and supplies of Sellita parts are far less widespread than ETA parts are - only last year did my local supplier start to carry Sellita parts.
Burt the differences go deeper than that - different tooth profiles on the ratchet wheels:
Tooth profiles on a lot of parts are simply not the same, and this means they are not compatible again, but it also has implications with how smoothly wheels are driven, and how robust things are.
Another example are the reversing wheels - different pinions on them:
To illustrate what sort of impact design decisions like tooth profiles can have, here is a screen shot of an old SW200 technical guide - note that this information has been removed from the current versions for whatever reason:
So as the text explains, the SW200 has many cases of the ratchet wheel teeth shearing off under use, so they beefed up the tooth profile in an effort to solve this problem. It required changing all the parts that this wheel interacts with also. So the SW200-1 is the "improved" version of this...
Note the broken ratchet wheel teeth, and the version of the movement...SW200-1. So saying that because they assembled movements for ETA means they can make a movement of the same quality is an assumption that history has proven to be incorrect, at least in some fashion anyway.
I'm not here to bash Sellita, and I have seen many accounts from people who have watches with their movements in them, and they report that everything is fine. I'm just showing you what I have personally experienced with these movements as they come across my bench, and hopefully illustrating that these are far from being identical to the ETA movements they replace.
I'm not saying they will blow up on you, but you should be aware that they have had issues in the past, and not only are parts for these not as widespread as the ETA movements, they are also quite a bit more expensive. Just one example - part 1488 reversing wheel for an ETA 2824-2 is $12 - same wheel for an SW200-1 is $41 from my local supplier...
Personally if it were me making the buy, I would get the 7750 version.
Cheers, Al
Click to expand...