Show us your Speedmaster Moon

Posts
220
Likes
424
Waitwaitwait....

Lego studs are compatible with Speedmaster pushers!?

There has to be a deeper meaning to this...
Haha yes! I was quite surprised, it was meant to be.
 
Posts
19
Likes
12
https://imgur.com/7LaXraO 7LaXraO
 
Posts
89
Likes
1,030
On a Alphashark slim Bond. I think the color of the grey stripe is more accurate to Omega than the original Alphashark.

47624933461_7099ee734b_b.jpg
 
Posts
6,509
Likes
77,049
Standard issue modern Speedy Gonzales Moonwatch. 👍

Original pic...



Jacked up pic via button mashing and Apple Pencil...

 
Posts
1,801
Likes
10,136
The New Era, a co-axial (Blasphemy!!) Speedmaster Moonwatch Chronograph.
311.33.44.51.01.001
 
Posts
886
Likes
470
The New Era, a co-axial (Blasphemy!!) Speedmaster Moonwatch Chronograph.
311.33.44.51.01.001

Sorry, but I'm not entirely certain that a Co-axial can actually qualify as a moon watch. At least not in the context of the origins and spirit of the thread.

But I suppose the question needs to be asked if a Co-axial can indeed qualify as a "Moonwatch" now that the 3861 movement has been born in a 50th anniversary Apollo XI watch.
Perhaps only a manual wind can be in the club??
Edited:
 
Posts
1,801
Likes
10,136
D Duckie
Sorry, but I'm not entirely certain that a Co-axial can actually qualify as a moon watch. At least not in the context of the origins and spirit of the thread.

But I suppose the question needs to be asked if a Co-axial can indeed qualify as a "Moonwatch" now that the 3861 movement has been born in a 50th anniversary Apollo XI watch.
Perhaps only a manual wind can be in the club??
I call it a "Moonwatch" only because Omega calls it that. The co-axial models are far removed from the originals, and even the current manual-wind models.
 
Posts
821
Likes
1,415
Are you guys really debating this?

Just enjoy the photos, that's what this thread is for.