Show us those sword hands!

Posts
54
Likes
330
I started my Omega journey with a 36mm sword hand quartz Pre Bond, followed by a 2264.50 Quartz Peter Blake. From the beginning, this handset has always appealed to me. After the quartz Blake, a couple of skeleton hand Seamasters have came and gone, but in the end I always gravitated back to the trusty swords. I have currently settled on my personal grail, a beautiful ‘Great White’ Seamaster GMT from 2006. The sword handset of this particular reference is really cool. They are a matte silver in the centre, followed by a glossy black coating towards the tip. The silver centre part almost ‘disappears’ along with the brushed steel look of the watch, leaving the remaining black hands with a ‘floating’ look.
I also recently obtained this Omega catalogue from 2001. I figured it would be a fun addition to the collection considering it contains the Great White, a multitude of other sword hand models as well as a price sheet (in Euros). The Seamaster selection in this particular year seemed to consist of 20 watches, of which 13 were sword hand models. I’ll include some catalogue pages and a price sheet below for those who are interested!

Pretty much all of the sword hand models look fantastic imo, you could probably have a great time collecting them alone. Many seem to share my love for the sword hand models, so i figured it’d be fun to dedicate a thread specifically to them. Looking forward to see those sword hands in action! ⚔️
Edited:
 
Posts
14
Likes
15
I agree with you! The sword hands are just so legible day or night and are a perfect combination with the hour markers.

 
Posts
3,648
Likes
24,695
I really like this one. If I had the money, that solid gold seamaster would be a fun flex.



My only minor critique with these is I think the proportions of dial to bezel are just slightly off. If the bezel were just a couple % thicker, I think these would be perfect.
 
Posts
3,197
Likes
9,577
I really like this one. If I had the money, that solid gold seamaster would be a fun flex.



My only minor critique with these is I think the proportions of dial to bezel are just slightly off. If the bezel were just a couple % thicker, I think these would be perfect.
Dont you mean thinner? One of the million reasons that I like the 2254, one is that the bigger numerals make the bezels look thinner than the Bond versions.
 
Posts
54
Likes
330

Awesome pictures. Is that a 2264.50 with a swapped bezel? The all brushed finish of the insert and flat link strap accompany each other really well, proper tool watch look! 👍🏼
 
Posts
222
Likes
1,759
Awesome pictures. Is that a 2264.50 with a swapped bezel? The all brushed finish of the insert and flat link strap accompany each other really well, proper tool watch look! 👍🏼
Yes, I had a steel bezel from this JDM model

And I swapped the hands for sword hands on the white dial for improved legibility.