Forums Latest Members
  1. M.T.Pham Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    9
    I am recently offered a Connie,
    but when I ask the pictures of movement inside and the back cover, the seller refused.
    As he said, he is not an expert, do not know and do not have tool to open the back, so he doesn't want to take the risks of opening it.
    So all I have is the picture outside.
    What do you think about this watch? As it is too far away from my place, I can not come and see the watch in reality.
    700 Eu is reasonable price?

    Thanks for your advices

    $_85.JPG $_85-2.JPG $_85-2.JPG $_85-3.JPG $_85-4.JPG DSC_4134.JPG
     
  2. NT931 Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    14,424
    Hmm, if there were no movement shots, I'd pass on the deal, unless the price was very compelling. There's always another one.
     
    M.T.Pham likes this.
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,632
    Ts on a dial with no tritium, I'd like to see a side profile shot too, those dogleg cases are among the most faked and he edges of the lugs look very soft
     
  4. styggpyggeno1 ΩF Enforcer ....and thread killer Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    3,832
    Likes
    43,904
    There are things fishy with this one. I would stay away from it. Double "T": s but no tritium on hands or dial. Then look at the font for the date....and the rest. No serifs. The star looks too big and too pointy...etc.
    If case is original it has been polished out of shape - look at top of lugs - no definition left at all.
     
    Edited Dec 7, 2014
    M.T.Pham likes this.
  5. Hijak Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    +1 on all of this...at best case I believe the dial to be fake.
     
    M.T.Pham likes this.
  6. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,632
    The fact that there's no side shot, that being the easiest way to determine whether the case is a fake or not, no movement shot and shadowy shots of the lugs makes it a concerning prospect in addition to the dial.
     
    M.T.Pham likes this.
  7. Hijak Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Agreed!
     
  8. M.T.Pham Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    49
    Likes
    9
    thank so much for advises. I pass this auction.
    Best regards
     
  9. cristos71 Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    7,155
    Likes
    32,933
    Just to add that I really don´t like that upward sloping "t" in "Constellation" and for that matter the size and shape of the complete lower case either, just looks wrong and too small.
     
  10. ChrisN Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    2,218
    Likes
    4,756
    The Guys really can spot a redial or fake at 30 paces. Terrific.:thumbsup: I am astonished that people are faking these but what do I know...

    Just for comparison, mine looks like this and I believe it is correct. Just to make sense of the above comments about fonts, star size etc. Nobody commented on the lack of marker on the right of the date window but that may be a dial variation.
    Fig43.jpg
    It looks like this on the inside if you're interested in this model:
    http://omegaforums.net/threads/cal-561-a-simple-summary.17131/

    Cheers, Chris
     
    Hijak and boat2dan like this.
  11. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    I believe that your dial is correct also.
    gatorcpa
     
  12. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Dec 7, 2014

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    [​IMG]

    I am 100% sure that dial is From China and so is the case. No need to look at the movement.
     
    M.T.Pham likes this.