Seamastering The Speedmaster

Posts
14
Likes
21
Being a grizzled veteran of Speedmaster ownership for nearly 72 hours, I have a question about the design of the Speedmaster: Would it be difficult to impart the degree of water resistance found in, say, the 300M Seamaster, into the current design of the Speedmaster? I have a pair of Seamasters which I like greatly, and nearly bought a third when I ultimately decided to purchase the iconic 3570.50. One of the qualities of the Seamaster that I like very much is the water resistance. I don't scuba dive, but like the idea that, as long as the screw-in crown and helium valve are properly closed, I can wash my hands, swim, etc. without great fear that I will damage the watch. I realize that, technically, I can perform the same relatively light activities with the Speedy, but I have the nagging fear that I'll someday look at the dial and find the chrono hands swimming in chlorinated water. I find the notion of a $4,500 swim somewhat unappealing.

So, while I would never dream of inflicting the helium valve onto a non-Seamaster, would waterproofing the pushers and incorporating a screw-in crown into the Speedmaster seem an acceptable evolution to Speedmaster enthusiasts? I realize that if a push-in crown and non-watertight pushers were acceptable to Buzz Aldrin, they should be good enough for me, but the Speedy has undergone some evolution since the mid-60's without losing the essence of the watch.

Is a little more evolution an acceptable development? Or am I going to hit the "create thread" button in a moment and turn around to find some kindly old watchmaker from Bienne fixing to kick my behind?
 
Posts
13,436
Likes
31,600
I believe the Speedmaster as well as most other modern Omega watches come from the factory with at least a 30m/100ft depth rating water resistance.
 
Posts
384
Likes
260
It may be officially 30m, but I wouldn't swim with it. Holding it underwater at a certain depth is not the same as swimming. I'm not sure whether you could actually make it waterproof but there are some here that know much more about he technical stuff. Would I do it? No - buy a Seamaster 165.024!
 
Posts
8,193
Likes
19,269
I was able to stop a similar paranoia I had regarding water damage to my Speedy. I took several sessions with my mental health counselor and he finally convinced me to trust Omega's specs of water resistance to 50 m (167 feet) 😁 - also I may add, the watch always comes off my wrist before jumping into the swimming pool/sea. 😁
 
Posts
14
Likes
21
My psychiatrist wears Tag Heuer - I can't relate to him. 😁
 
Posts
30,594
Likes
36,126
There are three major issues, firstly the pushers, they're not screw down at all and are designed for minor water resistance, if you ever operate the pushers while in water you risk letting water into the case.

Secondly the crystal is Hesalite not sapphire, its not designed for high pressures, and the way it seals isn't as serious as sapphire as its designed for replacement when worn out.

Thirdly and most significantly is the fact that the Speedmaster Pro is manual wind. Its being wound every day, while the crown is flush against the case while divers are very rarely wound. So the crown seal is doing a lot of work and suffering a lot of wear. It just isn't really practical for the Speedmaster design to be highly waterproof.
 
Posts
8,193
Likes
19,269
There are three major issues, firstly the pushers, they're not screw down at all and are designed for minor water resistance, if you ever operate the pushers while in water you risk letting water into the case.

Secondly the crystal is Hesalite not sapphire, its not designed for high pressures, and the way it seals isn't as serious as sapphire as its designed for replacement when worn out.

Thirdly and most significantly is the fact that the Speedmaster Pro is manual wind. Its being wound every day, while the crown is flush against the case while divers are very rarely wound. So the crown seal is doing a lot of work and suffering a lot of wear. It just isn't really practical for the Speedmaster design to be highly waterproof.


It seems the sapphire crystal is the main ingredient here - if you look at the specs on the other variants, equipped with either a self winding or manual movement but with a sapphire crystal, then the water resistant ratings are doubled to 100m/300ft.
 
Posts
13,436
Likes
31,600
The Hesalite crystal was more than sufficient for the SM 300, which used the same type press fit with tension ring crystal as used by the Speedmaster.

The crown issue could easily be addressed with a screw down crown, just like a hand wind Rolex Oyster.
 
Posts
227
Likes
65
If you want more water resistance, most of the Speedmaster range is 100m waterproof these days, which is more than sufficient. You still run the risk of pressing the pushers whilst underwater, which will compromise the seal, but it will handle everything else. If you want a chronograph that can handle everything underwater, then you will need to go for one of Omega's true Diving chronographs - the Bond 300m Chrono, or the Planet Ocean Chrono. These feature screw down crowns, helium escape valves, and the pushers are designed to be used underwater. They would be my recommendation if you want complete peace of mind 👍
 
Posts
30,594
Likes
36,126
The Hesalite crystal was more than sufficient for the SM 300, which used the same type press fit with tension ring crystal as used by the Speedmaster.

The crown issue could easily be addressed with a screw down crown, just like a hand wind Rolex Oyster.
Mind you, how many SM300s have water damage 😉
 
Posts
13,436
Likes
31,600
Mind you, how many SM300s have water damage
More likely the crown or back gasket and not the crystal.
 
Posts
30,594
Likes
36,126
More likely the crown or back gasket and not the crystal.
Yea true that