Forums Latest Members
  1. Ohm Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    4,365
    Dear Sir,
    I just got this watch from very nice seller. I have no idea about case ref. which was 11046253 ( information from seller) on this seamaster pie pan, cal.352 and movement series 12xxxxx, so please advise.

    Regards,
    Ohm
     
    A61A56CA-FEBC-431C-A1CD-CF1327897195.jpeg 16A9AEBF-7DAA-4F80-92F4-7D0C710F3D43.jpeg 083BF4A0-C1C1-43BB-AA00-0AB9E7CED570.jpeg 338B733C-81F9-4292-B5E9-78BF69A6DA94.jpeg 9593F5E5-517D-4B12-89C9-9B0506D20EA1.jpeg
    balaja, Hijak, GregH and 10 others like this.
  2. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,685
    Like.
     
    ChrisN and Ohm like this.
  3. Passover Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,854
    Likes
    2,528
    I'm not an expert on this model but dial fails the MOY test... Is MOY test carried out also on Seamasters or only on Constellation?
     
    Edited Dec 22, 2017
    Ohm likes this.
  4. Ohm Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    4,365
    I am not sure for this, Sir.
     
  5. padders Oooo subtitles! Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    8,931
    Likes
    13,873
    That looks like a Connie deluxe dial which has been confusingly repainted with Seamaster script and used in a gold SM case. It does look nice but I doubt it is original. I rather hope I am wrong as it does look very appealing. I have seen a few Seamasters described as 'pie pan' recently and without fail they have been no such thing but perhaps this is the exception!
     
    Edited Dec 22, 2017
    Samir and Ohm like this.
  6. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,685
    I'll eat my hat if that's thing is repainted.
     
    Ohm, patrick1616, ConElPueblo and 2 others like this.
  7. cristos71 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    7,134
    Likes
    32,881
    cicindela, Ohm, Mods and 1 other person like this.
  8. Buck2466 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,174
    Likes
    7,584
    Beat me to the punch:p The only thing I'm curious about is the case back without a reference number and did these only come in a calendar version?
     
    Edited Dec 22, 2017
    Ohm likes this.
  9. fjf Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
  10. mydeafcat Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,305
    Likes
    6,160
    Ohm likes this.
  11. BenBagbag Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    8,983
    Beautiful watch. I'll eat @BartH 's hat also if it is repainted. Beauty. Maybe also can call on @mondodec himself....
     
    Ohm likes this.
  12. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    4,411
    Likes
    11,220
    Interesting Seamaster Pie-Pan. First time I'm seeing one with a 352 - I have only seen them with 353/355 and 503. I used to own one with a 503 but I believe another member here has it now!
     
    dxholdren and Ohm like this.
  13. Ohm Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    4,365
    Appreciate all of comments and advise, Sir. I try to search information on any search engines, but cannot have information on this caseback ref.

    Regards,
     
  14. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    12,168
    Likes
    15,628
    Looks like the real deal to me, but the lack of a case reference number inside the caseback would be a concern.
    gatorcpa
     
    Ohm likes this.
  15. padders Oooo subtitles! Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    8,931
    Likes
    13,873
    A lot are calling no redial, fair enough but in which case please state a legit pie pan Seamaster example explain the lack of MOY compliance ( unless that doesn’t apply here)
     
    Samir and Ohm like this.
  16. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    4,411
    Likes
    11,220
    Looks like 2577/2520 but odd that it's missing a reference number.
     
    Ohm likes this.
  17. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    12,168
    Likes
    15,628
    Not following you at all. Nothing wrong with the printing on that dial that I can see. The photos are at all sorts of odd angles. There are scratches on the crystal also.

    Here’s a non pie-pan cal. 352 example with similar alignment.

    [​IMG]

    I think this is @MSNWatch’s example.
    gatorcpa
     
    ConElPueblo and Ohm like this.
  18. Ohm Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    4,365
    Like Kyle said, I accidentally found the 18k seamaster cal.352, the case ref. no. was 2577/2520 (11046584) as picture. Of mine was 11046253. However I will update picture after watchmaker open the case back for me.

    Thank you all advise, Sir
     
    4C28EF36-6C69-4D3F-8704-EF0771B779E2.jpeg A7798AF2-930A-43BB-8040-E48BF62B56BD.jpeg DC873297-0DE2-4AD5-BC34-0ACD9A0F1F18.jpeg F757B3B9-D577-4142-BA89-54C839A71688.jpeg
  19. Ohm Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    300
    Likes
    4,365
    And repectation to @cristos71 for this pictures.
    I found from forum.tz-uk.com which was non pie pan seamaster, cal.352 and case back ref. showed only 8 sequence of number like mine. I am not sure about this, is it possible, Sir?

    Reguards,
    Ohm
     
    1F83CF3F-9406-4E94-A7D8-38D7C5244B9E.jpeg 6EA4BCBD-045E-42B2-8C50-032CD7DA2AF9.jpeg 6C527151-73FA-49BD-82D7-EF7B543C8995.jpeg 37C07855-E738-45F5-9654-CFA73A1D30DB.jpeg
  20. padders Oooo subtitles! Dec 23, 2017

    Posts
    8,931
    Likes
    13,873
    Might that be a local French market case pethaps?