Forums Latest Members
  1. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Greetings all. Was anyone here after this SM Grand Luxe on the bay?

    Am glad to be back on ΩF, and looking for some thoughts or opinions on this piece!

    362.jpg

    362a.jpg

    362c.jpg

    362b.jpg
     
  2. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    26,980
    Likes
    32,684
    Its a Norman Morris US cased Seamaster, the Grand Luxe moniker was a little out of place on this one but its original
     
  3. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Besides the missing swan neck regulator, I had my doubts about the crown too. Any thought on whether its original to the model?
     
  4. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    I have a NOS 2846 GC and it has a basic clover leaf crown. However, this model with this dial is basically a one off design and it would be very difficult to say. You would have to find more of these to compare with. Kyle had an image of one of these, perhaps he still has it.

    As far as the regulator, remember this is not a chronometer.
     
  5. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur May 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Steve.

    The swan neck is missing, there are two holes there for nothing
     
  6. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    Here are some image from a previous thread. All have the basic clover crown
    OmegaGrandLuxeb.JPG
     
    omegavint-1296765321-36204.jpg omegavint-1296765325-36206.jpg Omega Grand Luxe.jpeg
  7. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    The very few images I could find online all had the basic 4 or 5 leaf clover crowns, none with this style, but the matching color to the case implies original (?)
     
  8. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Again, all the images of this model I could find with revealed movements all showed the 501 with the regulator. As long as those holes are there, I guess it would be easy to install a new one. Atleast the rest of the movement seems all to match together, what's showing of it, that is!
     
  9. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    We need to call you Eagle Eye Hoi, though I must admit that I did not even look at it, thinking Mel was just discussing it not being a swan neck. Very sloppy of me.
     
    hoipolloi likes this.
  10. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    12,201
    Likes
    15,707
    Dial looks correct to me. I think that the Seamaster Grand Luxe was used with this case reference, so that's OK.

    Movement is missing the microadjustment part. That may or may not mean other pieces are missing.

    Case has also been heavily polished, maybe right through the gold-cap on the lugs.

    Unless it's real cheap, I'd pass on this one,
    gatorcpa
     
  11. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur May 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Thanks Steve. Erich said the same :D
     
  12. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Yes, I see that heavy scratch on the top right lug... but the whole watch gave me the impression it was full of fine daily use scratches, but over polished? The bottom side of the lugs seem sharp?
     
  13. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    The bottoms generally appear sharper, but the top and ends of these wear down with even a little polishing or cuff exposure. Like Gator said, it depends on the price. It is a nice looking and unusual watch.
     
    Melhadary likes this.
  14. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    How do these Seamaster Grand Luxe models, if even in solid gold, compare to the Connie Grand Luxe's?
     
  15. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur May 2, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    To me, the value of this Seamaster Grand Luxe is the Dial only. Without that dial, it's a normal gold capped Seamaster with a plain caseback.

    If it is in 18K solid gold with a Seamonster on back and powered by a Chronometre. It will be a different story.
     
  16. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member May 2, 2013

    Posts
    12,201
    Likes
    15,707
    Like bananas and raspberries. Both are fruit, but one is a lot more expensive than the other.

    Just remember that the dial on the Seamaster Grand Luxe isn't solid gold and on the Constellation Grande Luxe, it is.

    Also, almost no one outside of the USA knows about the Seamaster version, while the Constellaton was sold all over the world.

    gatorcpa
     
  17. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado May 2, 2013

    Posts
    12,607
    Likes
    29,898
    Actually not true, the dials on these are 18K gold.

    IMG_3250.JPG IMG_3251.JPG
     
  18. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Absolutely Hoi, that's definitely a winning trio on a Seamaster!
     
  19. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Actually Gator, that's exactly why I prefer those vintage Seamasters to Connies! But I better be careful where I tread here...:whistling:
     
  20. Melhadary May 2, 2013

    Posts
    617
    Likes
    989
    Is that why they are called "Grand Luxe", or are there any other attributes?