Holy smokes guys! I was offline all weekend thought I would check in on things! I had no idea the extent of nuance there is between some of these models, and even even the same watch for that matter! This forum has proven to be a wealth of information and I'm extremely appreciative for the responses. I'm excited to finally get some wrist time with it as it's been at the local watchmakers shop getting sized and cleaned. Hopefully will be able to pick it up today!

 

Al, or anyone else...if I were to pick up one of these on the pen rubber, would it be possible to get the 1610/930 bracelet? If so, how much do those typically cost?

 

nice dial

 

hate to drag up an old thread but is the clasp solid 18K Gold ?

 

Sorry to raise the Zombie thread again, but I was curious if there would be something different in the 2234.50's today's model which differentiated it from a 2254.50? Would the 212 be 213 or something?

 

Dunno but there was one version of the 2254.50 that had the newer reference naming convention: https://watchbase.com/omega/seamaster-diver-300m/212-30-41-10-01-001

It was a limited edition of 300 pieces. Not sure what the different bracelet would change it to.

 

It was an LE with only one bracelet...

 

The Speedy style bracelet as mentioned above. And it had this caseback, pretty cool but I think I like the hippocampus better.

Just north of 7000 euros
Omega Seamaster 300m 212.30.41.10.01.001 Watch | Watchfinder & Co.

 

yes of course. I guess the question was if there was a second bond bracelet option what would that long ass reference then be?

 

We'll never know...