I wish the dial picture was sharper but the watch looks very good to me. A pleasing patina if the photo can be trusted as to color.
I would want to see a photo of the dial that is not overexposed. Zooming in it looks like there may be some marks/ damage on the dial around the subregisters, but it is hard to tell. A better photo would help a lot in judging not only the dial, but the lume plots as well -- which are very intact while the lume on the hands is largely gone.
Would you say the dial is original and not redial Hands correct for year Winiding crown correct Also no seamaster logo on the case back ?? Sorry for all these questions but I am a complete novice with these