- Posts
- 98
- Likes
- 63
Marcello130
·Hi Folks, recently this 145.018 was posted in an auction catalogue.
I follow this reference and while I think it’s a nice example overall, something about the dial seems strange.
The indices of the sub dials seem smaller than in other examples. I am
Comparing it to my 145.017 / 860 but the same seems to be true for the 861 examples.
The other point is that the seamaster writing seems a little odd. I know there are both variants with the soft and the edge capital “S”, but the proportions seems strange.
Maybe this is just not such a common but still legitimate dial version, I just can’t find any single
Reference online and that seems strange.
What do you think?
Marcel
I follow this reference and while I think it’s a nice example overall, something about the dial seems strange.
The indices of the sub dials seem smaller than in other examples. I am
Comparing it to my 145.017 / 860 but the same seems to be true for the 861 examples.
The other point is that the seamaster writing seems a little odd. I know there are both variants with the soft and the edge capital “S”, but the proportions seems strange.
Maybe this is just not such a common but still legitimate dial version, I just can’t find any single
Reference online and that seems strange.
What do you think?
Marcel
