Hi

This is the first time I encounter a dial with both seamaster, geneva and 600. Do you think it is original?

Apparently ref.136.011, cal. 613 from 1968.

Kind regards

Henrik

 

Looks like someone added Geneve afterwards. Doesn't look centered to avoid running the crosshair line through part of the n

I would avoid it due to that

DON

 

Patina on hands and applied bits vs paint on dial.

 

Hi,
I have my dads old watch which is just similar. He got it as a present in 1970 and it's been in his possession all this time.
I'm a bit confused about this watch? Is it original or redial? I don't know if he's serviced it at some point?
Some forums say it's not possible to have Seamaster/600/Geneve in same dial? And Seamaster don't have crosshair?

But it's also hard to believe my dad has it redialed at some point?

So is this original or redial?

 

The OP's dial is original. There are quite a few of them like that and similar watches have been talked about here as well:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-seamaster-600-geneve.2228/
https://omegaforums.net/threads/sea...n-help-with-first-vintage-omega-please.39701/

So many examples:

 

Seamaster/Geneve compination seems to be more common. But Seamaster/600/Geneve is rare.
Some folks just say it's not possible, but it seems here's few examples in this forum also.

The reason i want to know, is it worth of servicing? I will show the watch to local experts also and ask their opinion before expensive service.

 

@TNTwatch, so many pretty examples. I like!

 

This is a 1964/65 131.018 . similar dial ...cal 601..

 

Yes.

 

Thanks, but they're just examples on the web with some belonging to other OF members

 

We haven't seen a picture of your watch so impossible to say if it's worth servicing.

 

Here's the photo