Forums Latest Members
  1. NEPTEM Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    3
    Likes
    0
    Hi All,

    I have a Seamaster caliber 321 from 1966, please see photos below, I want to know the original bracelet number, any help would be greatly appreciated.

    JA

    Foto 10-8-16 13 24 51.jpg
    Foto 10-8-16 13 25 32.jpg
    Foto 10-8-16 13 25 02.jpg
    Foto 10-8-16 13 24 41.jpg
     
    Edited Aug 10, 2016
  2. Dash1 Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    1,825
    Likes
    3,502
    That's a Seamaster.
     
  3. NEPTEM Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    3
    Likes
    0
    Thanks for the correction!
     
  4. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Yup. If it has a 321 movement, it's a Seamaster 145.006-66. I believe the correct OEM bracelet was a 1116 with 548 end links. I have this setup myself but here is a link of one recently sold on the OF with the 1116/548.

    Btw, it's possible it's an 861 movement from 1968. The case didn't change, I think, and both can use the same bracelet.


    Good luck

    https://omegaforums.net/threads/196...raph-145-006-black-dial-cal-321-papers.33748/
     
  5. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    If I search on the Extranet to show what movements were used with that case, only the 321 is shown...
     
  6. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Hi @Archer .
    I'm referring to reference 145.016-68, caliber 861. I don't own one but the case looks near identical to the 146.006-66. In fact the entire watch looks near identical. See pics below. The 145.016-68 also appears to have a 1116 bracelet.

    See below

    s490097580971589483_p138_i13_w2560.jpeg

    145.016-68 from the web
    161233618_omega-seamaster-chronograph-145016-cal861-black-dial-.jpg
     
  7. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    Just commenting on your post that a 145006 case would have an 861 inside - that case is for a 321, not an 861. So contrary to the post I quoted above, the case did change.

    When cases look "nearly identical" that doesn't mean they are in fact identical. These two cases use different crystals, case tube, pushers, enlargements rings, case back, etc. so they are definitely not the same case.

    Cheers, Al
     
    kov and Spacefruit like this.
  8. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    26,984
    Likes
    32,686
    I'd buy a vintage Omega mesh bracelet, looks way cooler on that type of watch and more manly.
     
    gemini4 and cicindela like this.
  9. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    As the OP was only concerned about the bracelet, is the lug size identical?
     
  10. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Absolutely an option but not original as I believe the 1116/548 was. I prefer the 1116 as the 548 end links complete the case. Here is a pic of the 145.006-66 with the steel mesh.
    242-201493143411_original.jpg
     
  11. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Aug 10, 2016

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    They are both 20 mm.
     
    gemini4 likes this.
  12. NEPTEM Aug 12, 2016

    Posts
    3
    Likes
    0
    Hi Gemeni4,

    Thanks for your reply!
    Yes this the same, I go to search the OEM bracelet.


    N