Thanks, but the mean rate has been -2.8/s which is OK for me. The BLNR has shown little deviation in all positions, which is what really matters in terms of any issues with precision, something which I have also learned with Al
. To be honest I really cannot be bothered to send it to a RSC for regulation but if I do see any significant decrease in performance I will probably send it in under warranty.
Below some reference rates from my current collection:
JLC Reverso Ultra Thin DuoFace: -4.1s/d
Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 42mm: -3.7s/d
Seiko Prospex Samurai Diver: -3.6s/d
Rolex BLNR: -2.8s/d
Omega Orbis Hour Vision: -1.3s/d
Omega AT 15000 Gauss: -0.8s/d
Casio G-Shock GMW-B5000-1JF: +0s/d, Bluetooth connected to my phone, so spot on, but I suppose that's cheating
Omega Speedmaster Apollo 11 45th LE: +1.1s/d
Rolex Explorer: +1.2s/d
Rolex Explorer 2: +1.3s/d
Omega SM300MC: +3.2s/d
Omega DeVille Tresor: +3.5s/d
Omega Speedy Tuesday LE: +5.5s/d
PS. In my first post I had forgotten that my 15K Gauss improved its rate from +4.5s/d to -0.8s/d after service.
Click to expand...