- Posts
- 504
- Likes
- 781
Seamaster 2849 18k
- Posts
- 13,166
- Likes
- 18,080
gatorcpa
··ΩF InvestiGatorCase, movement and buckle look correct to me. Crystal is signed, so at least it is original Omega.
I have similar hands on a Seamaster that I own, but mine is not 18K gold, so I’m not 100% sure of that.
gatorcpa
I have similar hands on a Seamaster that I own, but mine is not 18K gold, so I’m not 100% sure of that.
gatorcpa
- Posts
- 896
- Likes
- 3,708
TheGreekPhysique
·My favorite reference and was my first purchase as an entry into vintage. Hands are non lume and so is the dial so I believe they are correct. Cal should be 503. Dial appears original and not refinished.
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,805
SkunkPrince
·I am disinclined to assume those are wrong.
- Posts
- 2,763
- Likes
- 6,853
seekingseaquest
·Seamasters of the era typically (not always) had flat, non faceted hands like this. Connies usually had faceted hands. It looks like a nice, original watch to me. I’ve hypothesized that these very white dials may be service dials.. but just a hypothesis, it may be completely original.
- Posts
- 504
- Likes
- 781
Sa Calobra
·Thanks everyone- I ended up buying it, I had been looking for this model for a long time, so am happy I was able to find one in this state!
- Posts
- 896
- Likes
- 3,708
TheGreekPhysique
·Thanks everyone- I ended up buying it, I had been looking for this model for a long time, so am happy I was able to find one in this state!
- Posts
- 3,346
- Likes
- 13,076
MtV
·
- Posts
- 504
- Likes
- 781
Sa Calobra
·how much did you get it for?
- Posts
- 1,275
- Likes
- 5,690
- Posts
- 504
- Likes
- 781
Sa Calobra
·Thanks! It was bought from the first owner and I'm happy that it seems fully original. Thanks everyone for helping to assess it.
