mastro
·Hi everyone,
I'm considering buying this Seamaster 166.0207 with a Roman numeral dial, and I'd like a second opinion from more experienced eyes before committing.
Comparing the previous photo at against two other examples of the same reference I found online, I've noticed a few small differences in details. Aldo the dial looks suspiciously clean and bright white for a watch that should be around 50 years old, with no signs of the aging/patina I'd expect to see.
Here follow another 2 models found online for the comparison
Could anyone with expertise on vintage Seamaster dials tell me if this is consistent with an original, unrestored dial, or if these details are red flags for a reprint/redial?
Thanks in advance for any input!
I'm considering buying this Seamaster 166.0207 with a Roman numeral dial, and I'd like a second opinion from more experienced eyes before committing.
Comparing the previous photo at against two other examples of the same reference I found online, I've noticed a few small differences in details. Aldo the dial looks suspiciously clean and bright white for a watch that should be around 50 years old, with no signs of the aging/patina I'd expect to see.
Here follow another 2 models found online for the comparison
Could anyone with expertise on vintage Seamaster dials tell me if this is consistent with an original, unrestored dial, or if these details are red flags for a reprint/redial?
Thanks in advance for any input!


