Forums Latest Members
  1. MarcWinkman Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    68
    Likes
    34
    I've been wearing my PO 8500 daily for almost a year now, including on a few shooting trips. I just noticed this morning that there's a tiny scratch in the sapphire crystal over the dial. It's tough to see unless I really look for it, but knowing where it is, my eye goes straight to it on close inspection. Is there anything short of replacing the crystal that can be done about this?
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  2. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Sorry to hear that. leave it till next service Omega will sort it out. It is possible to scratch sapphire, one member on a thread the other day was certain it was impossible to scratch.
     
  3. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Could you show us a picture of the scratch?
     
  4. MarcWinkman Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    68
    Likes
    34
    It is most certainly possible to do. I've done it to my Breitling Steelfish...and the same way, while at my work bench in the basement working on something.

    I've been trying to catch a picture of it, but because of it being relatively small and me not having a proper camera (thank you iPhone), I can't really get it to show up in a picture. The best description however, is that it looks like a smear on the crystal, but wiping it clean with a damp microfiber cloth followed by a dry one doesn't get rid of it.
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  5. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Don't worry sounds minor. At next service they will replace crystal.
     
  6. yinzerniner Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,869
    Likes
    1,394
    The scratch you see is more than likely just a scratch to the outer Anti Reflective coating that comes on the PO 8500 crystals. If it was a deep and very noticeable scratch it would most likely be a scratch through the coating and all the way down to the sapphire, but the way you describe it sounds much more like the first option.
    As such, you have three different options for dealing with the situation
    1 - Fully remove the AR coating. A lot of people have done this, and it either takes a decent amount of elbow grease with a cloth and mild polishing compound and/or a trip to a qualified watchmaker. Removing the AR coating will get rid of the surface scratch but not affect the rest of the crystal. Obviously some reflections will now be noticeable whereas before the crystal looked perfectly transparent, but you won't need to worry about picking up any more scratches unless your daily routine involves punching diamonds.
    2 - Remove and then reapply the AR coating. I'm not sure how feasible this is but I though I remembered seeing that it's possible. More painstaking but most likely a less costly option than replacing the entire crystal.
    3 - Replace whole crystal.

    Best of luck with the situation, and hope it can be resolved soon.
     
    woodsjo3 and PatrickJ like this.
  7. Canuck Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    13,477
    Likes
    38,007
    The hardness of any genuine or synthetic mineral is calculated based on its resistance to be scratched by another mineral of its kind. The MOHs scale has sapphire (corundum) at a hardness of 9, and diamond at a hardness of 10. This might imply that sapphire is almost as hard as diamond. Not so! Depending on which expert you read, diamond is about 100 times more resistant to being scratched by a diamond, than sapphire is to being scratched by another sapphire! I believe the AR coating on these crystals is oxide of fluorine. Whether it is the coating or the crystal that is scratched, it is a nuisance!
     
  8. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    I'm not sure that omega will replace it as part of service. They may replace it at service time, for a cost. I believe the crystals go for about $650 USD.

    Can you learn to live with it?
     
  9. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    I was sure they would charge for the crystal when the watch was serviced as an additional cost. However, $650 USD my god are they that much! No point if it is not noticable. @Archer will know the exact cost I am sure. That crystal costs £438 sterling pounds, can't be right??
     
  10. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    PatrickJ likes this.
  11. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    26,459
    Likes
    65,595
    Crystals vary quite widely in price. Few are less than $200 though for sapphire.
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  12. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    That makes more sense in sterling that is £153, still a tad high but in the right ballpark.
     
  13. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    Thanks for reply AL. I was wondering on a tangent how much is the moonwarch crystal for a modern version? Must be a lot cheaper for obvious reasons?
     
  14. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    26,459
    Likes
    65,595
    Acrylic is cheap so $40 or so. Sapphire will cause some pain if you need a new one...
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  15. wsfarrell Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    2,441
    Likes
    4,133
    Kind of boggles the mind that people put AR coatings on the outside of vulnerable crystals. Inside coatings turn the crystal invisible enough for me, though I admit I haven't done a side-by-side comparison.
     
  16. cfw Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    424
    Likes
    509
    Heres an Aquaracer and its very scratched

    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1451499955.621300.jpg
     
  17. MarcWinkman Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    68
    Likes
    34
    From what you describe, it sounds like it is definitely a scratch in the AR coating as it doesn't catch my fingernail, it's just visible in just the right light from the right angle. I'll wait until service time rolls around and then see what the recommendation is.
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  18. Canuck Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    13,477
    Likes
    38,007
    The reason for the coating on the outside makes some sense. As light reaches a reflecting surface, some of the light penetrates the surface, but light outside the "critical angle" is reflected away, and doesn't penetrate. With the coating on the inside of the crystal, the reason for applying it is defeated! The un coated outer surface loses just as much light as if the coating wasn't there at all! I don't know in percentage terms how much the coating on the top surface improves the light absorption, but it is considerable!
     
    Saysay likes this.
  19. yinzerniner Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,869
    Likes
    1,394
    I think what @wsfarrell meant was why have a sapphire crystal, which is known for its hardness and scratch resistance, if you then coat it with a material that's neither hard nor scratch resistant. Yes, the AR will make the crystal dissapear and the dial more legible, but at what cost?
    Cool old post here that goes into watch AR coatings. Basically, the internal only AR coatings on Bretilings at that time made reflectance roughly 5%, while the double AR makes it roughly 1%. So 5x greater clarity, but still even with only the internal AR a very low level of light is reflected.
     
    PatrickJ likes this.
  20. PatrickJ Dec 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,567
    Likes
    858
    My dad has a panerai and i managed to chip the glass. I have always had faith in the scratch resistant not proof sapphire analogy. I prefer the plexiglass crystals.